Dirac brackets and gauge in special relativity.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of Dirac brackets in the context of gauge fixing within the framework of special relativity. The action for a relativistic point particle is presented as S=-m∫dτ(-˙x²)¹/², leading to the canonical momentum pₘ= m˙xₘ/(-˙x²)¹/². The primary constraint φ₁=p²+m²≈0 is established, and the user inquires about the validity of imposing specific Dirac brackets, particularly {xᵘ,pᵛ}ₗ=ηᵘᵛ, while determining conditions for a second-class constraint φ₂. The discussion references Henneaux's book for further insights on the topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the action principle in classical mechanics.
  • Familiarity with canonical momentum and constraints in Hamiltonian mechanics.
  • Knowledge of Dirac brackets and their derivation in constrained systems.
  • Basic concepts of gauge theory in the context of special relativity.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Dirac brackets in constrained Hamiltonian systems.
  • Explore the role of gauge fixing in the quantization of relativistic systems.
  • Read "Quantities of Gauge Theories" by Henneaux for deeper insights into gauge constraints.
  • Investigate the einbein formulation for quantizing free relativistic particles.
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, gauge theories, and the Hamiltonian formulation of mechanics. It is also relevant for graduate students studying advanced topics in special relativity and constraint dynamics.

raul.cuesta
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,
It's well known that the action for a relativistic point particle is:
[tex] S=-m\int d\tau\left(-\dot{x}^2\right)^{1/2}[/tex]
the canonical momentum is

[tex] p_{\mu}= \frac{m\dot{x}_{\mu}}{\left(-\dot{x}^2\right)^{1/2}}.[/tex]

This action is invariant under reparametrizations of [tex]\tau[/tex], then its canonical Hamiltonian vanishes and we have a primary constraint of first class:
[tex] \varphi_1=p^{2}+m^{2}\approx 0.[/tex]

Then, in order to eliminate all arbitrary funtions of the system we can use the gauge freedom in the action, this is done by imposing a second constraint [tex]\varphi_2[/tex] such that [tex]\varphi_1[/tex] becomes second class and now we can use the Dirac brackets to work out the problem.

My question is: Is it valid if I ask the Dirac brackets to be

[tex] \left\{x^{\mu},p^{\nu}\right\}_{D}=\eta^{\mu\nu},[/tex]
[tex] \left\{x^{\mu},x^{\nu}\right\}_{D}=\left\{p^{\mu},p^{\nu}\right\}_{D}=0,[/tex]

and then I try to find the conditions on [tex]\varphi_2[/tex] and finally work with this brackets?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, actually the form of the Dirac brackets is always derived, either for a first class or second class constrained system. See more on this matter in Henneaux's book. And btw, the free relativistic particle is easier to study/quantize in the einbein formulation.
 
Hello again,
I know how to calculate the Dirac brackets, my question is about the gauge fixation. Normaly we choose the form of the constraint [tex]\varphi_2[/tex] and then we calculate the Dirac brackets. What I want to know, is if this is valid:
1.-Impose the Dirac brackets to be:
[tex]\left\{x^{\mu},p^{\nu}\right\}_D=\eta^{\mu\nu}[/tex]
[tex]\left\{x^{\mu},p^{\nu}\right\}_D=0[/tex]
[tex]\left\{x^{\mu},p^{\nu}\right\}_D=0[/tex],
2.-Find restrictions over a posible second-class constraint [tex]\varphi_2[/tex] in order to obtain the above brackets. For example:
[tex]\left\{x^{\mu},p^{\nu}\right\}_D=\eta^{\mu\nu}=\eta^{\mu\nu}-\left\{x^{\mu},\varphi_{a}\right\}C^{-1}_{ab}\left\{\varphi_{b},p^{\nu}\right\},[/tex]
where [tex]a,b=1,2[/tex], this is true if:
[tex]p^{\mu}\left\{p^{2},\varphi_2\right\}\left\{\varphi_2,p^{\nu}\right\}=0,[/tex]
3.-Maybe find who is [tex]\varphi_2[/tex] and/or simply work the theory with the brackets in 1.

Greetings!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
966
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K