Direct observation of lorentz length contraction

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of Lorentz length contraction as it pertains to a thought experiment involving a train moving at relativistic speeds. Participants explore how the length of the train, as perceived by both the train observer and a ground observer, changes due to relativistic effects. The scope includes theoretical reasoning and conceptual clarification related to special relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario involving a train with rods lowered to the ground to measure length, questioning whether the distance between the marks on the ground would reflect Lorentz length contraction.
  • Another participant suggests that the marks made on the ground would be farther apart from the perspective of the ground observer, indicating that the ground is what contracts from the train's perspective.
  • It is noted that if the marks are made simultaneously from the train's viewpoint, they will not be simultaneous for the ground observer, leading to different measurements of the train's length.
  • A participant agrees that the train appears shorter to the ground observer but expresses confusion over a statement that suggests the distance between the marks would increase, indicating a potential contradiction.
  • Another participant clarifies that the timing of events is crucial, emphasizing that the ground observer must use their own timing to measure the contraction, as each observer perceives the other's measurements as contracted.
  • Further clarification is provided that while the two events are simultaneous for the train observer, they are not for the ground observer, who sees the rear mark being made before the front mark.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the basic principles of length contraction but express differing interpretations of how the measurements relate to each observer's frame of reference. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of simultaneity and the apparent contradiction in measurements.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the assumptions of simultaneity and the dependence on the observers' frames of reference. The discussion highlights the complexity of measuring relativistic effects and the potential for conflicting interpretations.

rajeshmarndi
Messages
319
Reaction score
0
There is a train(think of having only two boggie for a claer visualization ) in which two rod which are attached to the front and rear end of the train(say, the length between these rod is the length of the train). These are lowered by a single lever to touch the ground. These rods are at different length from the body of the train, so that when lowered it will touched the ground at different distance from the track of the train, drawing two lines along the track.

The distance between these two starting lines will be the same as that of the length between the rod or to say the length of the train at normal speed.

As the train approaches say .8c speed, the lever is lowered to touch the ground.

Would the length between the two starting lines drawn along the track, would actually contract, which would be a direct observation of the lorentz length contraction?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry, but I can't decipher this. Could you maybe post a diagram, or draw some sort of picture?
 
rajeshmarndi said:
There is a train(think of having only two boggie for a claer visualization ) in which two rod which are attached to the front and rear end of the train(say, the length between these rod is the length of the train). These are lowered by a single lever to touch the ground. These rods are at different length from the body of the train, so that when lowered it will touched the ground at different distance from the track of the train, drawing two lines along the track.

The distance between these two starting lines will be the same as that of the length between the rod or to say the length of the train at normal speed.

As the train approaches say .8c speed, the lever is lowered to touch the ground.

Would the length between the two starting lines drawn along the track, would actually contract, which would be a direct observation of the lorentz length contraction?

Thanks.
They would make marks that are farther apart on the ground. Remember, as far as the train is concerned, the ground is what is contracted so when it lowers the rods at the same time, the rods are farther apart as far as the ground is concerned.
 
You also have to remember this: if the two marks are made at the same time relative to the observer in the train, the ground observer will not see the marks being made at the same time.

What the ground observer will measure is that:
- The train is shorter than it was when it was at rest relative to the ground.
- The rear mark will be made before the front mark.
- The train moves forwards between making the two marks, enough that the distance between the marks is more than it was when the train was at rest relative to the ground.
 
elfmotat said:
I'm sorry, but I can't decipher this. Could you maybe post a diagram, or draw some sort of picture?

the diagram
 

Attachments

  • train.JPG
    train.JPG
    11.4 KB · Views: 503
ghwellsjr said:
the ground is what is contracted so when it lowers the rods at the same time, the rods are farther apart as far as the ground is concerned.

As the train moves fast the ground observer see the train length contracts.

So isn't the ground observer would have found the train length contract, from the marker on the ground.
 
Michael C said:
What the ground observer will measure is that:
- The train is shorter than it was when it was at rest relative to the ground.
I agree.
- The train moves forwards between making the two marks, enough that the distance between the marks is more than it was when the train was at rest relative to the ground.
But here the statement seems contradicts with the former statement.
 
Michael C explained why your scheme won't work, because the timing is based on the train.

In order for the ground observer to measure the contraction of the train, he has to use his own timing. Remember, they each measure the other one as contracted.
 
rajeshmarndi said:
But here the statement seems contradicts with the former statement.

There's no contradiction. The point is that the two events are simultaneous for the train observer, but not for the ground observer. The ground observer sees the rear mark being made before he sees the front mark being made.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
7K
  • · Replies 166 ·
6
Replies
166
Views
15K