Direction of Photo Electron Emission

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the emission direction of photoelectrons when subjected to X-ray radiation, exploring the angles of emission, factors influencing these angles, and the differences between various experimental techniques such as ARPES and XPS. Participants express uncertainty regarding the behavior of emitted electrons and seek clarity on the underlying physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the emission angles of photoelectrons under non-polarized X-ray beams typically range from 70-80 degrees relative to the beam, but question whether electrons move towards or away from the X-ray source.
  • One participant mentions that the direction of emitted electrons can depend on whether the X-ray beam is incident from the front or back, and that the work function varies with different crystal planes.
  • Another participant raises a conflict between the "any direction" assertion and historical experiments from the 1920s-30s, which suggested a preferential angle of emission.
  • ARPES is introduced as a technique that can provide information on the direction of emission, with a distinction made between X-ray photoemission and standard ARPES experiments conducted in the UV range.
  • It is noted that in ARPES, the preferred direction of emission is influenced by the in-plane momentum of electrons in single-crystal materials, while polycrystalline or amorphous materials may not exhibit such directional emission.
  • One participant expresses a desire for modern references on the direction and polarization of photoelectrons emitted by X-rays, indicating that current literature often provides limited information.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the directionality of photoelectron emission, with some suggesting a preference for certain angles while others argue for a more isotropic emission. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of electron behavior and the influence of experimental conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the topic, noting factors such as work function variations, crystal structure, and the influence of extraction fields on electron paths. There are also references to historical experiments and modern techniques that may not fully align in their findings.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to researchers and students in the fields of condensed matter physics, materials science, and experimental physics, particularly those focused on photoemission techniques and X-ray interactions with matter.

Leb
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
I was looking for information on how the photo electrons are emitted when under X-ray radiation. In this ancient review paper here http://journals.aps.org/pr/pdf/10.1103/PhysRev.30.488 they state that the most common angles for non polarized X-ray beams (of various energies) range roughly at around 70-80 degrees with the beam. It is unclear to me, whether the photo electrons are moving towards the source of the X-ray beam or away from it ? Undergrad texts do not seem to shed light on this matter, the best one gets is pictures with emitted electrons being at a 90 degree angle to the incoming photon. Also, I assume this angle is given for a cone, i.e. it's 70-80 w.r.t. the beam, but with 2pi angle around the beam ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Debends upon whether the beam is incident from the front or the back. I've done a lot of photo-electron generation, mostly in transmission.

The energy reqired to emit an electron is the "work function", which varies with the crystal plane that is encountered: 111, 210, etc. Each has a slightly different work function.

But the liberated electron may shoot off in any most any direction, though there are statistics (which I don't recall the details at the moment; they are in my old notes).

Most interactions don't make it out because of (a) going in a bad direction, or (b) scattering. Thus only interactions within a skin depth might be productive, and even then not many.

If there is an extraction field, the electron paths get straightened out.
 
Well, that "any direction" answers seems to conflict with experiments from 1920-30's, I wonder why did they find a preferential angle...
 
M Quack said:
There is actually some information that can be extracted from the direction of emission. The technique is called
ARPES (angle-resolved photo-emission spectroscopy)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angle-resolved_photoemission_spectroscopy

http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.1438

Since I had done ARPES, I can comment on this.

The OP asked about x-ray photoemission, which is distinctly different than the "standard" ARPES experiment that is done in the UV range.

Secondly, in ARPES, the preferred direction of emission is due to the in-plane momentum of the electrons in the surface, i.e. the "k" in band structure. However, this also means that one must perform the experiment on single-crystal material. A polycrystalline or amorphous crystal will not have such directional emission and all you'll get is a momentum-averaged density of states.

I have not looked at the OP's reference, and thus, don't know if there's something similar here. XPS has other factors involved, and any preferential direction of photoelectron emission can be due to other reasons than what I stated here. Certainly, it could be angle-resolved XPS, which would have the same explanation as what I've given above.

Zz.
 
I have a question similar to the original post here. I can't find much information on the direction/momentum and polarization of photo electrons emitted by X-rays. Does anyone know of any good, modern, free references for this? So far the newer references I've found gloss over this topic with one sentence like "electrons scatter mostly in the direction of the E-field of linearly polarized incident X-rays," but I'm interested in learning more details about this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
516
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
11K