Discrete Math irrational and rational numbers proof

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a proof by contradiction concerning the nature of rational and irrational numbers. The original poster is tasked with proving that if \( a \) and \( b \) are rational numbers (with \( b \neq 0 \)) and \( r \) is an irrational number, then \( a + br \) is irrational. The context is discrete mathematics, focusing on properties of integers and definitions of rationality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts a proof by contradiction but expresses uncertainty about its correctness and whether they have adequately utilized the condition \( b \neq 0 \). They outline their proof steps and seek feedback on potential errors.
  • Some participants provide feedback on the proof, suggesting clarifications and additional steps to enhance clarity, such as explicitly stating that \( e \) is not equal to zero and listing steps for solving for \( r \).
  • Another participant offers a more concise approach to the proof, proposing a different method of expressing the relationship between \( a \), \( b \), and \( r \) that leads to a contradiction.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing constructive feedback and alternative perspectives on the proof. There is no explicit consensus on a single method, but various interpretations and suggestions are being explored, indicating a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is working under the constraints of a homework assignment that requires the use of specific mathematical properties and definitions, and they are encouraged to refine their proof based on peer feedback.

abjf9299
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove by contradiction. Your proof should be based only on properties of the integers, simple algebra, and the definition of rational and irrational.

If a and b are rational numbers, b does not equal 0, and r is an irrational number, then a+br is irrational.

Homework Equations



rational numbers are equal to the ratio of two other numbers

The Attempt at a Solution



I wrote a proof but am not sure it is correct. Please tell me what I did wrong and show me the way to do it right if this is not correct. My teacher indicated that we need to make use of the fact that b does not equal 0 (from a+br). Did I do that sufficiently as well?:

Proof: Suppose not. That is suppose that there exists rational numbers a and b, b does not equal zero, and irrational number r such that a+br is rational [We must deduce a contradiction].
By definition of rational, a = c/d, b= e/f , a+br = g/h for some integers c,d,e,f,g,and h with h,f,d, and b not equal to 0.
By substitution, a+b(r) = c/d +(r)( e/f) = g/h.
Solving for r gives: r = (fgd-chf) / (ehd)
Now fgd and chf are integers (being products of integers) and ehd does not equal 0 (by zero product property). Thus by definition of rational, r is rational which contradicts the supposition that r is irrational [ Hence the supposition is false and the statement is true].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks pretty solid. A few minor things I found:

1) You want to state when you're defining b that e is also not equal to 0.

2) You probably want to list your steps for solving for r, so your teacher doesn't need to go do extra work and check if it's right.
 
Thanks for the help! I'll correct those things ASAP before handing it in...
 
abjf9299 said:

Homework Statement



Prove by contradiction. Your proof should be based only on properties of the integers, simple algebra, and the definition of rational and irrational.

If a and b are rational numbers, b does not equal 0, and r is an irrational number, then a+br is irrational.

Homework Equations



rational numbers are equal to the ratio of two other numbers

The Attempt at a Solution



I wrote a proof but am not sure it is correct. Please tell me what I did wrong and show me the way to do it right if this is not correct. My teacher indicated that we need to make use of the fact that b does not equal 0 (from a+br). Did I do that sufficiently as well?:

Proof: Suppose not. That is suppose that there exists rational numbers a and b, b does not equal zero, and irrational number r such that a+br is rational [We must deduce a contradiction].
By definition of rational, a = c/d, b= e/f , a+br = g/h for some integers c,d,e,f,g,and h with h,f,d, and b not equal to 0.
By substitution, a+b(r) = c/d +(r)( e/f) = g/h.
Solving for r gives: r = (fgd-chf) / (ehd)
Now fgd and chf are integers (being products of integers) and ehd does not equal 0 (by zero product property). Thus by definition of rational, r is rational which contradicts the supposition that r is irrational [ Hence the supposition is false and the statement is true].

Since you have already answered the question, I don't mind pointing out some shortcuts. Let c = a + br, and assume a, b and c are rational, and that b =/= 0. Then we can solve for r: r = (c-a)/b (legal because b is not zero). The numerator c-a is rational and the denominator b is rational, so their ratio is rational. This contradicts the assumption that r is irrational. Thus, c must also be irrational.

RGV
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
13K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K