Dispersive Component of Surface Energy

Unto
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm doing an MSc project concerned with the treatment of plastic polymers with an μ-APPJ. I have been getting a tonne of results on different plastics using an APPJ of He carrier gas with an Oxygen admixture of 1/2, 1 & 2%.

However, in my analysis I'm unsure of what the dispersive component of the surface energy is and why it more or less stays the same.

Can someone give me a definition of what it is? I think its to do with van der waals but nothing on the net is giving me a good answer.

Is it supposed to stay the same irrespective of whether the material has been heated up or its polar component increases?

How would I interpretate my data on the surface energies for example:

He_o2_SurfaceEnergy_zpsdf773115.png


For convention, -5mins to 0mins is the 5minutes of plasma treatment. I'm not measuring the plastic during this time, hence the constant values and the discontinuity when I first measure it after treatment.
This is one of my preliminary results with Acetate plastic. Treated 1 run with He gas, 2nd run with He + O2. The legend will tell you. The dispersive components stay relatively the same, why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can anyone tell me what the definition of Dispersive Component is?
 
Bump, I still don't know what constitutes the Dispersive Component of Surface Energy.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top