I Disproving Velocity's Effect on Space-Time

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter stevedgarcia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space-time Velocity
stevedgarcia
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
For the past few weeks, I've been struggling with the idea that velocity must curve space-time because of phenomena such as time dilation. Initially, I believed that because time is a component of space-time, through the phenomena of time dilation, velocity must curve space-time. I think I reasoned my way out though. Let me know if I fouled up somewhere.

1) Travelling at relativistic speeds contracts space by a speed dependent factor (namely, the Lorentz factor)
2) Travelling at relativistic speeds dilates time by a speed dependent factor (namely, the Lorentz factor)
3) Therefore, traveling at relativistic speeds contracts space and time by the same factor
4) Thus, space-time does not curve with increased velocity, but instead, it compresses in all 4 dimensions equally in a way

Furthermore, time dilation occurs only to objects within the object traveling at relativistic speeds. So, there is no (1/r^2) or any such field parameter felt by surrounding objects. Therefore, there is no curving of space-time induced by increased velocity.

Earlier, when I was trying to figure what the hell I was thinking about, I read a post about this topic. Somebody posted an interesting thought experiment:

"Now here is an interesting thought experiment. Imagine a train on a long straight horizontal monorail that is suspended from springs that directly measure the weight of the train and the rail. When the train is accelerated to the same velocity as the bullet in the OP [relativistic velocity] will the track scales directly measure the train to be 7 time heavier?"

I believe the answer is no for the reasons stated above. Also, it's interesting to consider whether, due to contraction and all, would the train even be able to stay on the track. I think not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stevedgarcia said:
Thus, space-time does not curve with increased velocity, but instead, it compresses in all 4 dimensions equally in a way
You are correct that spacetime does not curve due to velocity. This is actually part of the meaning of the principle of relativity. Straight lines in one inertial frame map to straight lines in another inertial frame, not curved lines.

However, the Lorentz transform is not a compression, but rather a shear. A unit cube of spacetime is not mapped to a smaller or larger cube, but a rhomboid.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Back
Top