Distance as a function of time for two falling stones

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the motion of two stones in free fall, focusing on how their distances change over time given different initial conditions. The subject area includes kinematics and the equations of motion under gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the initial conditions of the stones, such as initial velocity and position, and how these affect their distances over time. Questions arise regarding the correctness of equations used and the implications of starting times for each stone.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's equations and reasoning. Some suggest clarifying definitions and variables for better understanding, while others highlight the conceptual aspects of relative motion between the stones.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted assumption about the timing of when each stone is dropped, which affects the equations being used. Participants also mention the importance of defining variables clearly when presenting mathematical relationships.

MatinSAR
Messages
673
Reaction score
204
Homework Statement
Suppose you drop a stone from a very tall tower. After the first stone goes down 4 meters, you drop the second stone from the same height. Does the distance between two stones decrease or increase with time?
Relevant Equations
Constant acceleration equations for free fall.
I am aware that this question is very simple and basic.
Using ##y(t)=y_0+v_{0,y}t-\frac {1}{2}gt^2## we can find distance as a function of time:
##|y_1-y_2|=|y_0+v_{0,y}t|=-y_0- v_{0,y}t##
I assumed the downward direction to be negative. So as I wrote ##D(t)=-y_0- v_{0,y}t##. It tells that the distance increases linearly with time. But I wanted to describe it to a friend, withhout math.
Can I say that the distance increases because 1st stone had nonzero initial velocity and nonzero initial position? Is this answer enough to get the question's point?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
They do not start at the same time. Your method is OK. But your equations are incoirrect.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
It's probably sufficient to say that the 1st stone always has a velocity greater than the 2nd stone at any instant in time, so will always be pulling away. BTW, can you say what happens to the time interval between the 2 stones passing any particular point on the tower? That might also help you in your explanation to your friend... :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
Or plot the velocity (or position) of each stone vs time on the same graph........each is the same curve offset by 4 seconds horizontally. You can put in air resistance roughly!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
hutchphd said:
They do not start at the same time.
Yes, I know.
hutchphd said:
But your equations are incoirrect.
I assumed the origin of time when the second stone is dropped and the first stone is at ##y=y_0## with an intial velocity. Why is this wrong?
berkeman said:
It's probably sufficient to say that the 1st stone always has a velocity greater than the 2nd stone at any instant in time, so will always be pulling away. BTW, can you say what happens to the time interval between the 2 stones passing any particular point on the tower? That might also help you in your explanation to your friend... :wink:
Thank you for your help.
 
MatinSAR said:
I assumed the origin of time when the second stone is dropped and the first stone is at ##y=y_0## with an intial velocity. Why is this wrong?
When you are trying to write for others to read, you should define your variables first and then write your equations after.

[Failing to clearly define variables is a pet peeve for me. I learned computer science in the 70's and we had that stuff drilled in to our heads repeatedly]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
jbriggs444 said:
[Failing to clearly define variables is a pet peeve for me. I learned computer science in the 70's and we had that stuff drilled in to our heads repeatedly]

@MatinSAR -- That's why he wears that helmet now... :wink:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444, SammyS and MatinSAR
jbriggs444 said:
When you are trying to write for others to read, you should define your variables first and then write your equations after.
I apologize. I thought that the question is simple and doesn't need more explanation.
We drop 2nd stone at ##t=0##. At this time 1st stone is at ##y=y_0## and has velocity of ##v_{0,y}##.
So we can write their position-time equations :
##y_1=y_0+v_{0,y}t-\frac {1}{2}gt^2##
##y_2=-\frac {1}{2}gt^2##
Now we should find ##|y_1-y_2|## as I mentioned in post #1:
"Using ##y(t)=y_0+v_{0,y}t-\frac {1}{2}gt^2## we can find distance as a function of time:
##|y_1-y_2|=|y_0+v_{0,y}t|=-y_0- v_{0,y}t##
I assumed the downward direction to be negative. So as I wrote ##D(t)=-y_0- v_{0,y}t##. It tells that the distance increases linearly with time."
berkeman said:
@MatinSAR -- That's why he wears that helmet now... :wink:
Interesting. 😅
 
MatinSAR said:
Is this answer enough to get the question's point?
The question's conceptual point is that, once the two stones are in free fall, their velocities change in exactly the same way because they have the same acceleration. This means that their relative velocity at the time of release of the second stone will not change. It follows that their separation will change linearly with time as you have found. Note that this result is independent of whether the stones are given initial velocities directed up, down or sideways relative to ##g##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR and nasu
  • #10
kuruman said:
The question's conceptual point is that, once the two stones are in free fall, their velocities change in exactly the same way because they have the same acceleration. This means that their relative velocity at the time of release of the second stone will not change. It follows that their separation will change linearly with time as you have found. Note that this result is independent of whether the stones are given initial velocities directed up, down or sideways relative to ##g##.
Thank you for your time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and kuruman

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
62
Views
7K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K