Distance Formula: Find JK Distance to Nearest Tenth

  • Thread starter Thread starter xowe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the distance between two points, J(2,-1) and K(2,5), using the distance formula. The user initially calculates the distance but expresses confusion about their method. It is confirmed that the calculation is correct, as the x-coordinates are the same, simplifying the problem to finding the difference between the y-coordinates. The user appreciates the clarification and acknowledges that recognizing the simplification would have saved time. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of understanding the distance formula and its application in specific cases.
xowe
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Yah, easy I know, but I got a little confused. Okay, here's the problem:
Find the distance between the points to the nearest tenth. J(2,-1) K(2,5) Here's what I did. d=√(2-2)^2+(5-(-1)^2 (the ^2 means squared) √(2-2)^2=0 so I'm left with √(5-(-1)^2= √(6)^2= √36=6 Ok, so how did I do? I wasn't sure if what I did was right, I think so, but I just needed to make sure. Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your solution is correct.
 
In fact, in that case, since the x coordinates of (2,-1) and (2,5) are the same so the distance is just the distance between -1 and 5 on a number line: 5-(-1)= 6.
 
Oh, yah I never thought about that. Heh, that would have saved some time, I'll remember that! Thanks to both of you.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top