Distance travelled whilst decelerating

  • Thread starter Thread starter gary32
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a train coasting up an 8-degree gradient after power is turned off. The train has a mass of 80 tonnes and experiences tractive resistance. Participants are tasked with calculating the distance the train travels before coming to rest, while considering forces such as gravity and tractive resistance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Newton's second law (F=ma) and the need to identify all forces acting on the train. There are attempts to calculate forces and acceleration, but confusion arises regarding the correct use of formulas and the role of gravity in the scenario.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of the problem. Some have provided calculations and diagrams, while others have raised questions about the assumptions made, particularly regarding the effects of gravity and tractive resistance. Guidance has been offered on considering all retarding forces together.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need for clarity on the forces acting on the train and how to incorporate them into calculations. There is also a reference to homework constraints and the requirement to prove answers through alternative methods.

  • #31
voko said:
#29 did not answer any of the questions in #28. Potential energy is relevant, but the question was about total energy.

I think I've got it,

KE = 0.5 x Mass x Velocity2
KE = 15054400J

So that is the amount of energy dissipated when it comes to a stop so
height = energy / m x g
height = 15054400 / 80000 x 9.81 = 19.18m
using trig,
hyp (distance) = opp (height) / sin(8)
distance = 19.18/sin(8) = 137.8m

NOW, I know I have not implemented tractive resistance here, I am not sure where I would implement it?
What is Newtons/kg? I kind of figure if I implemented it with an acceleration/velocity it would be word done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
You have computed the height assuming no resistance. But there is resistance. So the train performs some WORK to overcome it. How are the initial total energy and the final total energy are interrelated with work?
 
  • #33
voko said:
You have computed the height assuming no resistance. But there is resistance. So the train performs some WORK to overcome it. How are the initial total energy and the final total energy are interrelated with work?

Initial energy + Work energy = Final total energy?

What is Newtons per kg physically? to me, Newtons is a force, as in weight, as in, mass x gravity and then kg is a mass so to me i see it as mass x gravity / mass which is just gravity so its confusing.
How can I formulate N/Kg into work energy, I have searched the internet and cannot find a formula that uses Newtons mass and energy in it
 
  • #34
gary32 said:
Initial energy + Work energy = Final total energy?

Correct.

What is Newtons per kg physically? to me, Newtons is a force, as in weight, as in, mass x gravity and then kg is a mass so to me i see it as mass x gravity / mass which is just gravity so its confusing.

You were able to use the coefficient to find the tractive resistance force earlier, why are you confused now?

How do you compute work when you know the force?
 
  • #35
voko said:
Correct.
You were able to use the coefficient to find the tractive resistance force earlier, why are you confused now?

How do you compute work when you know the force?

I calculated tractive resistance force as F = 80000 x 0.07 = 5600N
That is just a force, not work done?
I know work done is Force x Distance, but I don't have an actual distance other than the one I calculate in the end (and tractive resistance needs to be implemented before you work out the distance right?)

EDIT: Unless I am being plain stupid and Work done = Force x Some angle (sin8)?
 
  • #36
gary32 said:
I calculated tractive resistance force as F = 80000 x 0.07 = 5600N
That is just a force, not work done?

Correct.

I know work done is Force x Distance

Correct, too.

but I don't have an actual distance other than the one I calculate in the end

So make it some unknown variable, and solve for it.
 
  • #37
voko said:
So make it some unknown variable, and solve for it.

You've lost me now :confused:

Please give me a clue or example,
 
  • #38
If force is F, and displacement is s, what is the work of the force?

If the displacement is s along the gradient angle a, what is the elevation in the end? And what is the corresponding potential energy?
 
  • #39
voko said:
If force is F, and displacement is s, what is the work of the force?

If the displacement is s along the gradient angle a, what is the elevation in the end? And what is the corresponding potential energy?

Work of the force is F x displacement?

If displacement is s along the gradient a,
The end elevation is Sin8 x s
Corresponding potential energy is 15054400J?

I still am lost, honestly, I am probably as dumb as it gets when it comes to mechanics, you need to dumb things down to my level :frown:
 
  • #40
gary32 said:
Work of the force is F x displacement?

Use the symbol ##s## for displacement.

If displacement is s along the gradient a,
The end elevation is Sin8 x s
Corresponding potential energy is 15054400J?

This cannot be a number, because the end elevation is ## s \cdot \sin a ##, where ##s## is unknown. So you have to write that down as a formula.
 
  • #41
voko said:
Use the symbol ##s## for displacement.



This cannot be a number, because the end elevation is ## s \cdot \sin a ##, where ##s## is unknown. So you have to write that down as a formula.

So what now? Also, what was the principle I used to initially work the problem out?
 
  • #42
gary32 said:
So what now?

Write the work-energy equation in terms of known and unknown variables, and solve it.

Also, what was the principle I used to initially work the problem out?

Not sure whether there is a particular name to it. FBD analysis and first principles of motion, perhaps.
 
  • #43
voko said:
Write the work-energy equation in terms of known and unknown variables, and solve it.

Not sure whether there is a particular name to it. FBD analysis and first principles of motion, perhaps.

There are 2 unknown variables (from what I can see) so I can't see a way for solving it,
I will have to not submit this work and not get the mark as I am away until the day it needs submitting.

Thanks for everyones help, it has been appreciated.
 
  • #44
Which two unknowns do you think you have here?
 
  • #45
voko said:
Which two unknowns do you think you have here?

Work done is unknown because that's what I am trying to find and s appears to be unknown, i know you've said s sin but that means nothing to me. Of course this is solvable but I don't have a clue how
 
  • #46
Work depends on s. Just write that down as a formula. Then plug that formula into the energy-work equation. That will eliminate the work as an unknown.
 
  • #47
voko said:
Work depends on s. Just write that down as a formula. Then plug that formula into the energy-work equation. That will eliminate the work as an unknown.

Work = F x s
Energy-work equation = F d = (1/2 mv2) - (1/2 mv2)

Energy-work equation = F d = (1/2 x 80000 x 02) - (1/2 x 80000 x 19.42)

= -15054400J

d = W/F
d = -15054400J/what force?
 
  • #48
gary32 said:
Work = F x s
Energy-work equation = F d = (1/2 mv2) - (1/2 mv2)

This is not what you had in #33.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K