Distribution Function: Computing P(X-Y > a) w/ f(m,v)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on computing the distribution function P(X-Y > a) using the known joint density function f(m,v). To find this probability, one can either perform a double integral over the region where X-Y > a or derive the distribution of the random variable Z = X - Y through integration. The participant expresses confusion about whether to use partial derivatives of the integral to find the density for X-Y > Z, particularly regarding the limits of integration and their dependence on Y. Clarification is sought on the correct setup for the integral and whether the approach aligns with the initial computation of f(x,y). The conversation highlights the complexities involved in transitioning from joint distributions to the distribution of derived random variables.
Rane3
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've computed a distribution function f(m,v) by taking partials of P(X<m, Y<v) with respect to m, v. Suppose I wanted the distribution function for P(X-Y > a). Since I know f(m,v), can I use that to help me compute my new distribution function by taking partials? If so, how? I'm a little confused about this. Any good resources/references?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You mean you have a density function f(m,v) - the (joint) distribution function
would be F(m,v) = P(X &lt; m, Y &lt; v).

I'm not sure which of the following two items you want for your second question:

i) You want a specific calculation of P(X - Y &gt; a) for a given value of a. In this case you calculate this double integral

<br /> \iint_{\{X-Y &gt; a\}} f(x,y) \, dx dy<br />

ii) You want an expression for the distribution of the random variable Z = X - Y.
You can either work out it out as an integral:

<br /> P(Z \le z) = \iint_{\{X-Y \le z\}} f(x,y) \, dx dy<br />

or you can do a transformation of variables approach.
 
I am looking for the second description, although I just want the probability density. If I know that:
X>0
X-Y>Z
and I know f(x,y), how can I find the density for X-Y>Z by taking partial derivatives of the integral? I'm getting myself confused. Should it again be partials with respect to Y,X, like I used to find f(x,y) in the first place? It seems that when I setup my limits, there is no dependence on Y and that throws me off.
\int_{-\infty}^{X}\int_0^{X-z}f(x,y)dydx Is this even the correct integral?
 
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
Back
Top