# Div, Curl and all that jazz: Proving identities

1. Homework Statement
Prove:

$$\int\left(\nabla \times \vec{F}\right)\cdot d\vec{V} = \oint \left(\vec{\hat{n}} \times \vec{F} \right) dS$$

2. Homework Equations
In the previous part of the question, we proved that:

$$\nabla \cdot \left( \vec{F} \times \vec{d} \right) = \vec{d} \cdot \nabla \times \vec {F}$$
(where d is a constant vector)
And also, it looks like we'll need to use the Divergence theorem.

3. The Attempt at a Solution

OK, so, here I go!

$$\int\left(\nabla \times \vec{F} \right)\cdot \vec{\hat{n}}dV \\ = \int \nabla \cdot \left( \vec{F} \times \vec{\hat{n}} \right) dV$$

By the relation above proved from the previous part of the question. Next, I used the divergence theorem:

$$\int \nabla \cdot \left( \vec{F} \times \vec{\hat{n}} \right) dV = \oint \left( \vec{F} \times \vec{\hat{n}} \right) \cdot d\vec{S}$$

My question is...Is $$\oint \left( \vec{F} \times \vec{\hat{n}} \right) \cdot d\vec{S} = \oint \left(\vec{\hat{n}} \times \vec{F} \right) \cdot d \vec{S}$$?

My initial thought is that it isn't, as the cross product isn't commutative. If that is thecase, where else have I gone wrong?

Cheers!

Related Calculus and Beyond Homework Help News on Phys.org
HallsofIvy
Homework Helper
What is the orientation of the surface in each integral?

Erm, I'm don't know what an the orientation of a surface is, but I've had an idea.

I know that:

$$\vec{F} \times \vec{\hat{n}} = -\vec{\hat{n}} \times \vec{F}$$

and that:

$$\int_{a}^{b} f(x)dx = - \int_{b}^{a} f(x)dx$$

But, since it's a closed integral, I guess if we reverse the 'order' of integration, it doesn't matter if we do: the start and end points are the same...and the minuses cancel. Seems a bit of mathematical trickery to me, though.