Divergence in spherical coordinates.

[yungman]

I want to verify:
\vec A=\hat R \frac{k}{R^2}\;\hbox{ where k is a constant.}
\nabla\cdot\vec A=\frac{1}{R^2}\frac{\partial (R^2A_R)}{\partial R}+\frac{1}{R\sin\theta}\frac{\partial (A_{\theta}\sin\theta)}{\partial \theta}+\frac{1}{R\sin\theta}\frac{\partial A_{\phi}}{\partial \phi}
\Rightarrow\;\nabla\cdot\vec A=\frac{1}{R^2}\frac{\partial \left(R^2\frac{k}{R^2}\right)}{\partial R}= \frac{1}{R^2}\frac{\partial k}{\partial R}=0

 

[HallsofIvy]

I don't have any problem with that until the last part. What does \partial k/\partial R mean? If "k" is the unit vector in the z direction, it is a constant, and any derivative of it is 0.

 

[TheShrike]

He defines $k$ as a constant. So $\frac{\partial k}{\partial R}$ is the partial derivative of $k$ with respect to the variable $R$ which is zero, as he gets.

 

[yungman]

Thanks, this is part of a problem in Electrodynamics where the solution manual claimed it is not zero. I just want to verify.

Thanks for the help.