Divergence of the curl problem question

  • Thread starter Thread starter galactic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curl Divergence
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical relationship between vector fields, specifically addressing the statement that any vector field with zero divergence can be expressed as the curl of another vector field. Participants emphasize the necessity of proving this by construction, using the equation \(\nabla \cdot \vec{V} = 0\) to find a vector field \(\vec{U}\) such that \(\nabla \times \vec{U} = \vec{V}\). A specific example provided is the vector field \(\vec{V} = yz\hat{x} + xz\hat{y} + xy\hat{z}\), which satisfies the divergence condition. The discussion clarifies that the task is to construct \(\vec{U}\) based on the components of \(\vec{V}\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically divergence and curl operations.
  • Familiarity with the notation and properties of vector fields in three-dimensional space.
  • Knowledge of differential equations and their applications in vector field construction.
  • Experience with mathematical proofs in the context of vector analysis.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector fields, focusing on divergence and curl relationships.
  • Learn how to construct vector fields that satisfy specific divergence conditions.
  • Explore the implications of the Helmholtz decomposition theorem in vector calculus.
  • Practice solving problems involving the curl and divergence of vector fields in three-dimensional space.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are studying vector calculus and its applications in fluid dynamics and electromagnetism.

galactic
Messages
30
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


if a vector can be written as the curl of another vector, its divergence vanishes. Can you justify the statement: "any vector field whose divergence vanishes identically can be written as the curl of some other vector"?

Homework Equations



Prove this by construction. Let {\nabla}{\cdot}{\vec{V}}=0 and try to find any vector, U, for which {\vec{V}}={\nabla}{\cdot}{\vec{U}}
This amounts to showing that you have enough freedom to pick as components of \vec{U}, functions which satisfy some simple differetial equations. Simplify somewhat by trying to find a vector, {\vec{U}}, for which, say, {\vec{U_z}}=0

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that for {\nabla}{\cdot}{\vec{V}}=0 we have to have for example, a vector field such as: {\vec{V}}={yz}\hat{x}+{xz}\hat{y}+{xy}\hat{z} so that when we do {\nabla}{\cdot}{\vec{V}}=0. I'm confused if the problem is just asking to prove the divergence of the curl is equal to 0 which I have already done a few homework problems ago or if its asking for something different here...because I'm confused by the hint that it's giving me (in relevant equations).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
galactic said:

Homework Statement


if a vector can be written as the curl of another vector, its divergence vanishes. Can you justify the statement: "any vector field whose divergence vanishes identically can be written as the curl of some other vector"?

Homework Equations



Prove this by construction. Let {\nabla}{\cdot}{\vec{V}}=0 and try to find any vector, U, for which {\vec{V}}={\nabla}{\cdot}{\vec{U}}
This amounts to showing that you have enough freedom to pick as components of \vec{U}, functions which satisfy some simple differetial equations. Simplify somewhat by trying to find a vector, {\vec{U}}, for which, say, {\vec{U_z}}=0

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that for {\nabla}{\cdot}{\vec{V}}=0 we have to have for example, a vector field such as: {\vec{V}}={yz}\hat{x}+{xz}\hat{y}+{xy}\hat{z} so that when we do {\nabla}{\cdot}{\vec{V}}=0. I'm confused if the problem is just asking to prove the divergence of the curl is equal to 0 which I have already done a few homework problems ago or if its asking for something different here...because I'm confused by the hint that it's giving me (in relevant equations).

I believe there is a typo in your relevant equations. They want you to show that if
\nabla \cdot \vec{V} = 0
for any particular vector field \vec{V}, then you can always find a vector field \vec{U} such that
\nabla \times \vec{U} = \vec{V}
They want you to construct a vector field U by x, y and z components that satisfies the second equation, using the equation for the divergence of V being 0 as the only given fact.
This is actually similar to a proof you may have done earlier: in 3-dimensional space, if \vec{A}\cdot\vec{B}=0, then there is a vector \vec{C} such that \vec{A}\times\vec{C}=\vec{B}.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
742
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K