DIY Vibration Measurement Device for Engineers using Flex Sensors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Smooth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Damping
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on creating a DIY vibration measurement device using flex sensors to measure vibrations along an axis. The device features a suspended weight that oscillates in response to vibrations, and the creator seeks to understand how to factor in air resistance and damping effects. While theoretical calculations for damping can be approached using the drag equation, practical challenges arise due to assumptions in the equation. Participants suggest measuring damping directly rather than relying solely on theoretical predictions, noting complexities such as hysteresis and nonlinear stress/strain relationships in the materials used. The creator plans to experiment with increasing the weight's surface area and potentially using a vacuum chamber to minimize air resistance effects.
Smooth
Messages
6
Reaction score
3
Hi,

I need something that would measure vibrations along an axis, so instead of buying a bunch of accelerometers I thought I’d quickly make smth myself. I’m majoring in engineering and not physics, so while I have no problems with the construction, I’m kind of stuck with the physics aspect.

I explained my device on image 1. I have a weight that is suspended by two films (flex sensors - Piezo vibration). When a vibration along the x-axis is introduced, the weight will deviate and oscillate a little until coming back to initial position.
The graphic is on image 2. Suppose the weight deviates from original position. I will have the returning forces of tension from the films, and since I know the Young’s modulus of the films I can calculate the tension force due to the films. I wrote the 2nd Newton’s law on image 3.

Now, here’s my question; how do I factor in air resistance/damping of this half-pendulum? Yeah, I can easily get it experimentally by graphing the waveform. But can I write equations though?

I’ll probably increase the surface area of the weight to increase air resistance and play around with its mass to increase the damping, but question remains - how do theoretically predict that damping effect?

Many thanks for any suggestions.
image 1.jpg
image 2.jpg
image 3.jpg
 

Attachments

  • image 3.jpg
    image 3.jpg
    45.8 KB · Views: 647
  • image 2.jpg
    image 2.jpg
    24.1 KB · Views: 704
  • image 1.jpg
    image 1.jpg
    23.6 KB · Views: 768
Physics news on Phys.org
Smooth said:
Now, here’s my question; how do I factor in air resistance/damping of this half-pendulum? Yeah, I can easily get it experimentally by graphing the waveform. But can I write equations though?
You could write down the damping forces. There is air resistance and probably some other things too. Those will typically involve constants, like the drag coefficient, that you have to measure experimentally. So you are probably better off to just measure the damping directly.
 
In theory, you could calculate the aerodynamic drag on the mass using the standard drag equation - Force = 0.5 X rho X V^2. In practice, that does not work because the equation assumes fully developed flow.

I learned this the hard way when I built a tuned mass damper using oil to damp the tuned mass. The damping oil changed the tuned mass frequency by a lot, my recollection is the change was about 40%. This was a puzzler until I calculated that the kinetic energy of the oil flowing past the tuned mass was about equal to the kinetic energy in the tuned mass. The diagram below shows the setup.

upload_2018-2-22_8-55-48.png

Also, there is likely some hysteresis, and possibly nonlinear stress/strain relationship, in the support film. I agree with @Dale, but amend his last sentence slightly: ..you are definitely better off to just measure the damping directly.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-2-22_8-55-48.png
    upload_2018-2-22_8-55-48.png
    18.9 KB · Views: 684
  • Like
Likes Smooth and Dale
Yep, I didn't want to mess with drag as the shape of the object isn't obvious, approximating Reynolds numbers, factoring the speed - pain in the neck.
I might eventually put it into a vacuum chamber just to approximate damping without air resistance.

Thank you @Dale and @jrmichler! Will be getting it experimentally then.
 
  • Like
Likes jrmichler and Dale
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top