Do All Forms of Energy Fit Into Kinetic or Potential Categories?

AI Thread Summary
Not all forms of energy fit neatly into kinetic or potential categories. While many simple forms of energy can be linked to these classifications, certain phenomena, like phase shifts and energy transfer to matter, do not conform to this binary. This indicates that energy can exist in more complex forms beyond just kinetic and potential. Understanding these nuances is essential for a comprehensive grasp of energy dynamics. Energy classification requires consideration of various factors beyond the basic categories.
samckx
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Do all forms of energy fit neatly into the larger categories of either kinetic or potential?

Sam
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not at all. All simple forms of energy can be linked, as the question you are asking implies, but phase shifts, such as the transfer of energy to matter, does not fall under these categories.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

Why do we add Kinetic and Potential energy?
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Hamilton’s principle maximises potential energy?
Replies
5
Views
1K
How does gravity convert potential energy to kinetic?
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Torque and Rotational Kinetic Energy Relationship
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Can energy be decomposed?
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Change of coordinates in a potential energy field
Replies
2
Views
1K
Internal forces converting kinetic into potential energy (vice versa)
Replies
10
Views
2K
I Kinetic Energy derivation assumption?
Replies
11
Views
2K
Is there any motion hidden within potential energy?
Replies
7
Views
1K
I Potential energy of a pressurized gas canister in space
Replies
8
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top