Do kinetic energy conserved in a 2 dimensional collision?

AI Thread Summary
Kinetic energy is not always conserved in two-dimensional collisions, as it depends on whether the collision is elastic or inelastic. In elastic collisions, such as those between metal balls or billiard balls, kinetic energy is conserved, while inelastic collisions result in some kinetic energy being transformed into other forms of energy. Perfectly elastic collisions are theoretical, as real-world materials always exhibit some inelasticity. The degree of elasticity in a collision is influenced by the rigidity of the materials involved. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing collision dynamics in physics.
mentoz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Like the tittle suggests, do kinetic energy conserved in a 2 dimensional collision? Like when 2 metal balls collide. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sometimes, when this happens we call it an elastic collision:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision

Sometimes, though, this does not happen. In these cases we call the collision an inelastic collision:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inelastic_collision

Nothing is ever perfectly elastic, because kinetic energy is not a conserved quantity, but there are lots of examples where, for all intents and purposes, kinetic energy is conserved. Two metal balls would be a good example of this, and the classic example are billiard balls. How elastic or inelastic a collision is depends primarily on the rigidity of the materials the objects are made from.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top