Do L² and r² Commute in Quantum Mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dreamspy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commute
dreamspy
Messages
41
Reaction score
3
Hi

The subject says it all. I'm wondering if [L^2,r^2] = 0 is true?

regards
Frímannn
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think ? On what variables does L^2 depend ?
 
bigubau said:
What do you think ? On what variables does L^2 depend ?

Well we have that:

\underline{\hat L }^2 = \hat L_1^2+\hat L_2^2+\hat L_3^2<br />

\hat L_1 = \hat x_2 \hat p_3 - \hat x_3 \hat p_2<br />

\hat L_2 = \hat x_3 \hat p_3 - \hat x_1 \hat p_3<br />

\hat L_3 = \hat x_1 \hat p_2 - \hat x_2 \hat p_1<br />

\underline{r }^2 = \hat x_1^2+\hat x_2^2+\hat x_3^2<br />

and

[x_i,p_j] = i\hbar\delta_{i,j}

[L_i,p_j] = 0, i = j

[L_i,p_j] \ne 0, i \ne j

[L_i,x_j] = 0, i = j

[L_i,x_j] \ne 0, i \ne j

So it seems to me that they don't commute. But I'we been told otherwize so I'm trying to figure it out :)
 
Last edited:
Are you sure about that? I get [x_1,L_2] = i\hbar x_3
 
Sorry that was a mistake. That should have been a \ne. I fixed the original post.
 
I'll give you a further hint: use spherical coordinates.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top