Do Linear Operators Equate on All Vectors if They Match on a Basis Set?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around linear operators T1 and T2 acting on a vector space V, with a focus on proving that if these operators yield the same results for a basis set of vectors, they must also yield the same results for all vectors in V.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the equality of linear operators on basis vectors and question what needs to be proven for arbitrary vectors in V.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered reasoning and steps to demonstrate the equality of the operators for all vectors based on their behavior on the basis vectors. There is an acknowledgment of the need for a clear statement regarding the generality of the argument.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion about the requirements of the proof and the assumptions involved in the problem statement.

pyroknife
Messages
611
Reaction score
4
Suppose that T1: V → V and T2: V → V are
linear operators and {v1, . . . , vn} is a basis for V .
If T1(vi) = T2(vi ), for each i = 1, 2, . . . , n, show
that T1(v) = T2(v) for all v in V .


I don't understand this question.
They said If T1(vi) = T2(vi ), for each i = 1, 2, . . . , n
wouldn't that mean T1(v)=T2(v) already? I don't get what I have to prove here.


Isn't this just saying
T1(v1)=T2(v1)
T1(v2)=T2(v2)
.
.
.
T1(vn)=T2(vn)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pyroknife said:
Suppose that T1: V → V and T2: V → V are
linear operators and {v1, . . . , vn} is a basis for V .
If T1(vi) = T2(vi ), for each i = 1, 2, . . . , n, show
that T1(v) = T2(v) for all v in V .


I don't understand this question.
They said If T1(vi) = T2(vi ), for each i = 1, 2, . . . , n
wouldn't that mean T1(v)=T2(v) already? I don't get what I have to prove here.


Isn't this just saying
T1(v1)=T2(v1)
T1(v2)=T2(v2)
.
.
.
T1(vn)=T2(vn)?

No. You are given that T1 and T2 give the same thing for the basis vectors. What about any other vector v? Show T1(v) = T2(v).
 
T1(v) = T1(c1v1 + ... + cnvn)
= T1(c1v1) + ... + T1(cnvn)
= c1T1(v1) + ... + cnT1(vn)
= c1T2(v1) + ... + cnT2(vn)
= T2(c1v1) + ... + T2(cnvn)
= T2(c1v1 + ... + cnvn)
= T2(v)
 
That's it.
 
pyroknife said:
T1(v) = T1(c1v1 + ... + cnvn)
= T1(c1v1) + ... + T1(cnvn)
= c1T1(v1) + ... + cnT1(vn)
= c1T2(v1) + ... + cnT2(vn)
= T2(c1v1) + ... + T2(cnvn)
= T2(c1v1 + ... + cnvn)
= T2(v)
Looks good. The only thing I would add is a statement like "Let v be an arbitrary member of V" or "For all v in V, we have..."

Edit: D'oh...too slow.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K