Do Particles at LHC Travel Near Light Speed?

AI Thread Summary
Particles at the LHC travel near the speed of light, experiencing time dilation, which means they decay more slowly compared to when at rest. The concept of velocity addition in relativity differs significantly from classical mechanics; for instance, two particles moving at 0.9c do not combine to exceed the speed of light. This principle explains why, when jumping inside a moving train, a person does not get pushed backward, as they maintain their horizontal velocity. In Newtonian mechanics, velocities can be added directly, but relativity shows that at high speeds, the addition is not straightforward. Overall, the effects of relativity ensure that particles can travel near light speed without violating universal speed limits.
Benplace
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
If particles at the LHC are traveling very near the speed of light, are they affected by the slowness of time?
Also, how can they travel near the speed of light when the planet is rotating around the sun and the solar system is traveling around the galaxy and the galaxy is moving through space, wouldn't those put the particles over the universal speed limit?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Yes, time will go slower for the particles (this can be seen because particles that are going at such speeds decay slower than if they were at rest).

And no, a consequence of relativity is that velocities do NOT add like intuition suggests: 0.9c + 0.9c =/= 1.8c.
 
Is that why when traveling on a train and you jump in the air you don't get slammed into the car behind you?
 
No, that's just a consequence of Newton's first law. In the case of the train, you and the train both have the same velocity. When you jump, there's no horizontal force on you that would slow you down, so you keep going horizontally with the same velocity (objects in motion will continue along their path unless acted on by an outside force).

What I mean is, in Newtonian mechanics, if I'm traveling in a car at 50 mph, and another car is traveling in the opposite direction going 50 mph, then we can add velocities directly and say that in my reference frame, I am at rest, and they're traveling at 100 mph. In relativity, however, velocities do not add like this. It just doesn't show for velocities low compared to the speed of light. Taking relativity into account, if I declare that I am at rest, the other car actually looks like it's going 99.9999999 mph as opposed to 100--in other words, velocity addition doesn't work the same in relativity.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top