Do Planck Units Remain Relevant Inside Black Holes?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relevance of Planck units within black holes, particularly regarding their applicability and potential modifications. Participants debate whether Planck units, defined by fundamental constants, retain their significance inside black holes, especially at the singularity where traditional physics may break down. The Planck length is suggested as the smallest meaningful scale, implying that a black hole cannot reach a size of zero. The conversation also touches on the implications of gravity becoming infinite at the singularity and whether constants like G could change in this context. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the idea that while Planck units have physical meaning, their relevance in extreme conditions remains a complex and unsettled question.
BernieM
Messages
280
Reaction score
6
Do Planck units apply inside of black holes? Are they modified? Or are they irrelevant? If some Planck units remain unchanged and applicable in black holes, which ones would those be?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
BernieM said:
Do Planck units apply inside of black holes? Are they modified? Or are they irrelevant? If some Planck units remain unchanged and applicable in black holes, which ones would those be?

Not sure what you mean, Planck units are just that, just a specific choice of units. The question is equivalent to asking if the mks or cgs unit system still applies within a black hole, which of course it does.
 
Planck length is the length at which quantum indeterminacy becomes absolute, for example. I don't think that is analogous to other conventional systems of measurement. But rather than debate that, perhaps I can explain further the reason for the question. If the radius of a black hole = 0 then gravity is infinite and physics breaks down in essence. But is it actually possible for something that begins by posessing properties of size, mass, energy, etc., to actually attain a size of ZERO? And if it can not become ZERO in size then the radius of the black hole can never have a radius of zero and no actual breakdown in physics occurs. Well I hope this helps to understand my real question then.
 
black holes definitely have a non-zero radius, I'm not sure what you're trying to get at
 
BernieM said:
Planck length is the length at which quantum indeterminacy becomes absolute, for example. I don't think that is analogous to other conventional systems of measurement.

The Planck length (or any other Planck unit) is simply defined as the collection of fundamental constants (speed of light, gravitational constant, fine structure constant, etc.) put together in the right combination to yield a quantity with dimension of length. It does indeed have physical meaning too, but the Planck length would only change inside a black hole if either G, c or \hbar changed inside a black hole.

But rather than debate that, perhaps I can explain further the reason for the question. If the radius of a black hole = 0 then gravity is infinite and physics breaks down in essence. But is it actually possible for something that begins by posessing properties of size, mass, energy, etc., to actually attain a size of ZERO? And if it can not become ZERO in size then the radius of the black hole can never have a radius of zero and no actual breakdown in physics occurs. Well I hope this helps to understand my real question then.

One possible meaning of the Planck length is that it is the smallest meaningful length scale, so that any object would at least have the size of the Planck length. This would preclude a black hole from having a size of zero. But this is far from a settled question.
 
I assume you are talking about the singularity as opposed to the event horizon. I'm not sure the Planck length is relevant, but, the Planck density may be. At 10^93 gm/cm^3 it is really big, but, not infinite.
 
Yes, I was not specific but I was referring to the singularity. I guess the problem I am having is that given that not even 'empty space' is ever truly empty, r could never = 0 as long as there is "something" there.
 
BernieM said:
Planck length is the length at which quantum indeterminacy becomes absolute, for example.

No, Planck length is defined as:
<br /> L_p \equiv \sqrt{\frac{G \hbar}{c^3}}<br />

Period! So, which one of these constants do you suspect to change within a black hole?
 
G. That's the problem if r=0 then G=\infty or at least that's how I understand the dilemma of why physics breaks down in the singularity.
 
  • #10
BernieM said:
G. That's the problem if r=0 then G=\infty or at least that's how I understand the dilemma of why physics breaks down in the singularity.

This is a terrible way to try to understand it. In Einstein's theory, the constant G is the constant G, end of discussion. It never changes. Other theories of gravity might have a G that varies, but not GR. What happens at the singularity is the curvature of spacetime is predicted to be infinite: this is where we get a problem.
 
Back
Top