Do research supervisors always want more students?

  • Thread starter Thread starter spaghetti3451
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Research students
AI Thread Summary
Research supervisors do not always welcome additional students, even if they offer to work for free without course credit. Key reasons include the supervisor's busy schedule, lack of student prerequisites, existing commitments to other students, and the absence of suitable projects. Some universities have policies that prohibit accepting unpaid students unless they meet certain criteria. The discussion highlights that while some professors may occasionally consider international students from underdeveloped countries, it is generally uncommon due to the overwhelming demands on faculty time and the often poorly constructed requests from potential students. Additionally, the effectiveness of supervision can vary significantly based on the advisor's approach, with more hands-off supervisors tending to take on larger groups, which can lead to challenges in providing adequate support.
spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
Do research supervisors always want more student to supervise?

Say some undergraduate student wants to do a research project for some professor for free with no course credit?

Will a professor be always happy to take on that student?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, this will not always be the case. There are several reasons a supervisor might not want to do this:
  • Too busy (even free students require supervision, they may be "free" money wise but not time wise)
  • Student does not have prerequisites (in some fields it may happen that you need a lot of prerequisites before you can make meaningful contributions)
  • Too many students (leaning towards the first category, but a supervisor might already have a lot of students and not want to overextend)
  • No appropriate project
  • Etc
Edit: also add "not allowed". At my university I would not be allowed to take a student who wants to work for free - there is a minimum you need to pay if it is not part of their program.
 
  • Like
Likes spaghetti3451
How often do professors use free students? Is it common for international students from underdeveloped countries to work for professors from renowned institutions (in US, Canada, or Europe) by communicating via email?

Do these students get any benefit out of the project apart from the research experience?
 
The too many students issue happens quite a lot, especially in theory. The number of students in a group depends on the advisor. In theory for example some people only want 1-2 but some could have 5-6 (and in a few cases even more but it is uncommon). However, even advisors who manage a large number of students will get overwhelmed. It also depends on how much the advisor interacts with students. Advisors who are more hands off often have more students, but you would need to be ok with working independently.
 
failexam said:
How often do professors use free students? Is it common for international students from underdeveloped countries to work for professors from renowned institutions (in US, Canada, or Europe) by communicating via email?
I would say no, it is not common. As a faculty member there is already way too many things which keep you occupied - including supervising and finding relevant problems for the students already admitted to the university. The many requests you get from students in other countries are often badly written and with profiles which are clearly too far away from your actual reasearch area to be of interest.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
947
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top