Do we know the position of the center of the Universe?

AI Thread Summary
The universe is expanding uniformly, and there is no specific center from which this expansion originates. Observers in any part of the universe, including those 5 billion light years away from Earth, would perceive the same expansion pattern. The analogy of a balloon illustrates this concept, where any point on the surface can be considered a center, with expansion occurring uniformly in all directions. This higher-dimensional perspective reinforces that the universe lacks a singular focal point. Understanding this helps clarify the nature of cosmic expansion.
NOAM
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
We know that the universe is expanding,but do we know from which point it is expanding outwards?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please read the FAQ in the cosmology section along with several of the threads on this exact subject. The short answer is that there is no center. If you were 5 billion light years from Earth you would observe the universe expanding away from you exactly like we see it expanding for us here.
 
NOAM said:
We know that the universe is expanding,but do we know from which point it is expanding outwards?

Think of it as if you were on the surface of a balloon, where the only access is the surface, you can't access inwards to the center, so any place on the surface of the balloon can be thought of as the center, lines leading away will converge at the other side but that happens no matter where you are on the balloon.

So the universe is like that but on a higher dimensional reference. That's about as close an analogy as I can come up with.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top