Do you list a publication (in a REU application) if ?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In the context of Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) applications, it is advisable to list publications that include your name, even if your contribution was minimal, such as producing plots and results. It is essential to clarify your role in your statement of purpose, emphasizing that you are not the primary author. The primary author is typically the first author or one of the first two authors, depending on the field, while some disciplines may list authors alphabetically, reducing confusion about authorship roles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of authorship conventions in academic publications
  • Familiarity with REU application processes
  • Knowledge of how to articulate contributions in a statement of purpose
  • Experience in creating a curriculum vitae (CV)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research how to effectively communicate your contributions in academic applications
  • Learn about authorship ethics in scientific publishing
  • Explore best practices for writing a statement of purpose for REU applications
  • Review examples of curriculum vitae that include publications
USEFUL FOR

Undergraduate students applying for REU programs, academic advisors, and anyone involved in academic publishing who needs clarity on authorship and contribution representation.

tim_lou
Messages
682
Reaction score
1
Should I list a publication if the paper has my name in there but I didn't actually write anything in the paper? (except producing some plots and results). Particularly when the professor just put my name there as a sort of "courtesy"?

If so, how do I specify that I am not the primary author or do I just leave it as it is. What about in curriculum vitae?

Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should mention your specific contributions in your statement of purpose that you send to the REU.
 
tim_lou said:
Should I list a publication if the paper has my name in there but I didn't actually write anything in the paper? (except producing some plots and results). Particularly when the professor just put my name there as a sort of "courtesy"?

If so, how do I specify that I am not the primary author or do I just leave it as it is. What about in curriculum vitae?

Thanks for the help.

If the paper has your name on it, then you should list it. Now, whether you have a significant contribution to it is a different matter. You should, at the very least, be able to defend the portion that you are responsible for. Your professor is correct in including your name in the paper even if all you did was to produce some work that gave him the result.

For most subject areas, the "primary author" is usually the first author of the paper, or the first two authors of the paper. Some journals even allow for the designation of more than one authors who share equal primary contribution. So in such cases, who is the primary author is well-known. But in other areas, such as when there's a huge list of collaborators, such as an experimental high energy physics paper, the authors are listed alphabetically. Here, I don't think you need to worry about people confusing you for a primary author, mainly because the people in the field will only focus on the "brand-name" principle investigators out of the large group of people. There may even be a designated spoke person for that group.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K