Does a finite universe make sense to you?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter epkid08
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite Universe
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of a finite universe, particularly the idea that it can exist without an edge, akin to the surface of a sphere. Participants argue that while a finite universe is plausible, it challenges common intuition and is difficult to visualize. The conversation also touches on the multiverse theory and the ongoing debate within the cosmology community regarding the nature of the universe, with references to influential works such as Janna Levin's "How the Universe Got Its Spots" and the evolving perspectives of prominent physicists like Leonard Susskind and Lisa Randall.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmological concepts such as finite vs. infinite universes
  • Familiarity with the multiverse theory and pocket universe concepts
  • Knowledge of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and its significance
  • Awareness of influential works in cosmology, including Janna Levin's writings
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) in cosmology
  • Explore the concept of pocket universes and their relation to the multiverse theory
  • Study the evolution of string theory and its current standing in the scientific community
  • Investigate the latest research on finite spatial volumes in cosmology
USEFUL FOR

Cosmologists, theoretical physicists, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of the universe's structure and the ongoing debates in modern cosmology.

  • #151
Do you really think there isn't a single solution? I don't think it will ever be complete, or consistent as far as human knowledge goes, but I think there does lie a single solution. That very fact is what intrigues me.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #152
sketchtrack said:
I have always been told the universe is expanding faster than C. Isn't the expanding space rather than moving galaxies thing just to satisfy the hypothesis that mass cannot move faster than C?

It is the gravitational expansion of the space time metric, not movement of mass in space.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K