Does a Fluorescent Bulb Use More Energy to Start Than to Run for 30 Minutes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the myth that fluorescent bulbs consume more energy during startup than they do when running for 30 minutes to an hour. It clarifies that while the initial power required to start a fluorescent bulb is indeed higher than its average running power, this surge lasts only a short time. The energy consumed during startup is significantly less than what the bulb uses over a longer period. The conversation references the role of the ballast in regulating current and highlights that misconceptions may stem from experiences with high-intensity discharge (HID) lamps, which require prolonged heating. Calculations show that even under maximum startup conditions, the energy consumed is minimal compared to the energy used during normal operation. Overall, the consensus is that the idea of higher startup energy consumption for fluorescent bulbs is a myth, supported by basic electrical principles and calculations.
Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
20
Now I've heard this so much that i just have to get a complete answer to it. Since they run on AC current, i wonder "Ok maybe this myth is right because i don't have a good enough understanding about alternatig current". The idea is that a flourescent bulb (sp?) uses more energy turning on then it will take to run for 30minutes to 1 hour. I figured i could try to guesstimate the OOM with DC current figuring "ok i don't think the estimation can be THAT far off using DC principles".

When i did the math... ok yah you need a power cable capable of 'hooking up' directly to a nuclear reactor :biggrin: . So I am skeptical! I'm calling on hte experts! Does it require more energy to keep a flourescent bulb on for 30 minutes then it does to start the thing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yah that's what I've wondered about. I had looked them up and figured there must be a large jump in current... but THAT big? Obviously not...
 
The starting power is much greater than the average one, but it lasts for only a short time, so the energy (power x time) is not great.
 
I think this misconception may have come from the fact that HID lamps need to be heated for several minutes before lighting, and that does use a significant amount of power.
 
Last edited:
I don't like being next to one of our metal hailide lamps when they turn on. It kinda scares me.
 
So this is all officially a 'myth'?
 
Basic estimation will get you far. Residential circuit-breakers typically max out at 15A; at 120V this means the instantaneous power consumption of all appliances on that circuit, can never exceed 1800W. Even a 100ms (~6 cycles) startup transient at the maximum possible current, which is clearly a strong upper bound, would consume 180J; a 20W fluorescent bulb would consume as much in 9 seconds of normal use. So there you go.

The OP mentions "more energy turning on then[/color] it will take to run for 30minutes to 1 hour." In an hour, a 20W bulb consumes 72,000 Joules; it would take 40 seconds for any appliance to consume this much without tripping the breakers. This of course is grossly unresonable for a transient.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top