Is There a Formula for Prime Number Factorization?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathJakob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
Prime number factorization remains a complex challenge, as no efficient formula exists for factoring large integers into their prime components. Current algorithms can factor numbers, but they are not fast, particularly for products of two large primes, which are commonly used in cryptography. It is generally easier to determine if a number is prime than to perform a full factorization. The discussion highlights the confusion around the terminology of "prime number factorization" versus general integer factorization. Overall, while methods exist, they rely heavily on brute force for larger numbers.
MathJakob
Messages
161
Reaction score
5
I've been looking into prime number factorisation and was wondering does a formula actually exist or is it thought to be impossible to factor primes using a formula and they need to be factored using brute force?
[/PLAIN]
RSA Algorithm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Maybe the OP is talking about taking an arbitrarily large number N and finding all of its prime factors. I think the terminology 'prime number factorisation' is somewhat confusing.

For instance, 12 = 2*2*3
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Yes that is what I'm talking about, sorry for the confusion

"The most difficult integers to factor in practice using existing algorithms are those that are products of two large primes of similar size, and for this reason these are the integers used in cryptographic applications."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integer_factorization
 
Yes, algorithms for factoring numbers into primes exist. But they're not very fast. Currently, it is much easier (=faster) to check if something is prime or not than to actually find a primal decomposition.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top