Does absolute space explain the inertial and non inertial forces?

AI Thread Summary
Absolute space is not necessary to explain inertial forces, as these forces are tied to acceleration relative to an inertial frame. The discussion highlights that if absolute space existed, it could theoretically account for inertial forces, but since absolute space does not exist, it cannot serve this purpose. The consensus is that inertial forces are better understood through the framework of relative motion rather than through the concept of absolute space. Examples illustrating this concept were requested to clarify the relationship between acceleration and inertial frames. Overall, the assertion that absolute space does not explain inertial forces is deemed correct.
Abhilash H N
Messages
39
Reaction score
5
The title might be confusing. Anyway while preparing for a seminar I made a statement, " Absolute space does not explain the inertial forces, since they are related to acceleration with respect to anyone of the inertial frame". Is this statement correct? Please explain with few examples, Thank you..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Abhilash H N said:
The title might be confusing. Anyway while preparing for a seminar I made a statement, " Absolute space does not explain the inertial forces, since they are related to acceleration with respect to anyone of the inertial frame". Is this statement correct? Please explain with few examples, Thank you..

Well, if there were such a thing as absolute space, it would suffice to explain inertial forces. But it is not necessary to explain inertial forces - and a good thing to, because there is no such thing as absolute space.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

Whether a non-inertial frame is absolute
2
Replies
94
Views
6K
B Inertial vs non inertial frames
Replies
3
Views
2K
Law of inertia (inertial observer and inertial frames of reference)
Replies
2
Views
1K
What is an inertial frame? A conflict of two definitions
2
Replies
83
Views
5K
What are non-inertial frames of reference?
Replies
15
Views
3K
Question based on non inertial frame of reference
Replies
17
Views
3K
Forces in inertial and non-inertial frame of reference
Replies
5
Views
1K
I Non-Newtonian description of an accelerated object
Replies
8
Views
1K
I Inertia/Non-inertial frame - isotropy
Replies
22
Views
1K
Effective acceleration due to gravity in non-inertial frame
Replies
6
Views
7K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top