Does adding different solid affect the quilibrium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nope
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solid
AI Thread Summary
Adding silver nitrate, which dissociates in solution, can affect the equilibrium of the reaction involving CoCl4 2- and Co(H2O)62+, as the Ag+ ion may interact with Cl- ions, potentially shifting the equilibrium. The initial assumption that adding a solid has no effect on equilibrium is correct, but the context changes with the introduction of ions in solution. Regarding the addition of gases or aqueous solutions, if the added species do not appear in the equilibrium expression, they typically do not alter the equilibrium position. However, if the added species do affect the concentrations of reactants or products in the equilibrium expression, they can shift the equilibrium. Understanding the specific interactions and concentrations is crucial for predicting the effects on equilibrium.
Nope
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


CoCl4 2-+6H2O --> Co(H2O)62++4Cl-+energy
If I add silver nitrate, which direction does it shift?
I think it is no effect, because adding solid does not affect the equilibrium?... Am i right?

Btw, what happen if i add aqueous to X gas --> Z gas + Y gas, vise verse...
or gas to x(aq)--->Z aq + Y aq
Thanks

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Silver nitrate is not being added as a solid. Assume that it is being added as a dissociated species in solution. What effect would the Ag+ ion have on the equilibrium?

I can't tell what you are asking about your gases but I assume that you are adding water vapor to a mixture of interconverting gases at equilibrium, yes? If the partial pressure of water vapor doesn't appear in the equilibrium expression, will it change the equilibrium?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top