Does All Gravitational Energy in Water Convert to Heat?

  • Thread starter Thread starter flatmaster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heating Water
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the assumption that all gravitational potential energy in a flowing stream converts to thermal energy. The participants explore the implications of this assumption, noting that while it is reasonable for an idealized physics problem, real-world factors such as turbulent dissipation, kinetic energy gain, and heat exchange with the environment complicate the scenario. Specific phenomena mentioned include turbulent heating and energy loss due to erosion and sound. Ultimately, while the assumption simplifies the problem, it overlooks significant energy interactions in actual stream dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy
  • Familiarity with fluid dynamics concepts
  • Knowledge of thermal energy transfer
  • Basic principles of turbulence in fluids
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of turbulent dissipation in fluid dynamics
  • Study the effects of kinetic energy on thermal energy conversion in flowing fluids
  • Explore heat exchange mechanisms between water bodies and their surroundings
  • Investigate the impact of erosion on energy distribution in streams
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, environmental scientists studying fluid dynamics, and engineers involved in hydrology or water resource management will benefit from this discussion.

flatmaster
Messages
497
Reaction score
2
I am writing an intro physics problem about a flowing stream. I am going to assume that all of the gravitational potential energy eventually becomes thermal energy of the water. I haven't worked it yet, but I'm pretty sure the flow rate and g will both cancel out and give me a constant change in temperature per unit of elevation change.

Is there a specific name for this phenomenon?

How reasonable of an assumption is this? Some energy must go into eroding rock, making noise, etc.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
I'm not sure which phenomenon you're specifically trying to name. Turbulent dissipation? Turbulent heating?

It doesn't seem that unreasonable for an "idealized" problem. In real life you would have some competing effects that would probably overwhelm the turbulent heating, including the gain in kinetic energy of the stream flow and heat exchange between the stream and the surroundings (especially the atmosphere which also tends to warm with decreasing elevation).

And sure, some energy might be lost to eroding/heating rocks, radiate away as acoustic or seismic waves to eventually heat something else, etc.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
6K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K