Does Bringing a Metal Ball Near a Charged Dielectric Transfer Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LiteHacker
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Bringing an uncharged metal ball near a charged cylindrical dielectric induces charge separation in the ball, with electrons moving away from the positive end of the dielectric. However, the metal ball does not acquire a net charge unless it makes contact with another object. The process involves energy from the electrostatic field being utilized to separate charges within the ball. The dielectric itself remains unchanged in terms of its overall charge distribution. Overall, while there is no net charge transfer to the metal ball, energy is indeed involved in the charge separation process.
LiteHacker
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Imagine you have a cylindrical dielectric charged with 100KV on one end and -100KV on the other end.

Now take an uncharged metal ball and bring it close to the positive end of the dielectric.

From what I understand, the metal ball will be induced into having a charge that will come close to -100KV, depending on how close it comes to the dielectric, via Electrostatic Induction.

When this is done, is there any transfer of energy? Does the dielectric change in any way? If so, in what way?
I can't find any equations that characterized the change in charged matter, or the change in uncharged matter..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From what I understand, the metal ball will be induced into having a charge that will come close to -100KV
Charge is not induction. The metal ball will not get a net charge (unless it has contact to something else) - it will have some charge separation, with less electrons close to the -100kV-point and more electrons far away.

Why do you use a cylindrical dielectric? Two charged objects (conductivity does not matter) would do the same.

When this is done, is there any transfer of energy?
Some energy of the electrostatic field is used to separate the charges.
 
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top