Does Convergence of (Sequence)^2 Imply Original Sequence Converges?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cloud360
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Sequence
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the convergence of a sequence and the convergence of its square. The original poster questions whether the convergence of the squared sequence implies the convergence of the original sequence.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of convergence, with some suggesting counterexamples to the original poster's assumption. There is a discussion about the logical structure of implications and converses in mathematical statements.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various participants providing insights and counterexamples. Some have pointed out the logical fallacy in assuming that the converse of a true statement is also true. There is an ongoing exploration of examples that illustrate the original question.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific sequences, such as oscillating sequences and the Harmonic series, to highlight the nuances of convergence. There is an emphasis on understanding the reasoning behind the examples rather than simply providing answers.

cloud360
Messages
212
Reaction score
0
If some (sequence)^2 converges does that mean the original (sequence) always converges?

(using mobile version)

attempted solution:

All i know is if {an} converges to L==> {an}^2 converges to L^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org


any help please, i really need. would be very grateful
 


I think this is false. Try using a sequence that oscillates between values for a counterexample.
 


but if its true that if {an} converges to L==> {an}^2 converges to L^2, then how can it be false?

going backwards means {an}^2 converges to L^2{an} converges to L


why am i wrong?
 


Consider the sequence [itex]a_n = (-1)^n[/itex] as motivation to what spamiam said. Clearly [itex]a_n^2 = (-1)^{2n} = 1[/itex] is the constant sequence and so converges. However, the original clearly does not converge as it oscillates between -1 and +1 indefinitely.

Edit: Fixed wording
 


As for the statement as how the other could be wrong, this is called the converse and is logically not equivalent to the original statement.

All dogs are mammals is true. The converse is that all mammals are dogs, and this is not true.
 


The converse of a true statement is not always true. Take the classic Alice In Wonderland example: I always breathe when I sleep, but this doesn't mean I always sleep when I breathe.

In other words, "P implies Q" does not mean that "Q implies P".

In any case, there's a very simple sequence that serves as a counterexample: try using my hint.
 


Kreizhn: I understand you're trying to help (which is great), but giving the exact answer is not the idea of PF, as that let's the OP simply copy the answer given onto their sheet without possibly understanding it/going through the thought procedure
 


If you are not satisfied with this boring example, try using the Harmonic series instead. Define
[tex]a_n = \frac1n [/itex]<br /> It is very well known that this series does not converge. However,<br /> [tex]a_n^2 = \frac1{n^2}[/tex]<br /> does converge.[/tex]
 
  • #10


thanks so much :)
 
  • #11


mr. vodka said:
Kreizhn: I understand you're trying to help (which is great), but giving the exact answer is not the idea of PF, as that let's the OP simply copy the answer given onto their sheet without possibly understanding it/going through the thought procedure

I know what you're trying to say, but at this point the answer has already been made clear. The issue is no longer that the answer has been given, but instead the motivation should be to clearly demonstrate why the solution is the way it is.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K