Does decoherence prevent 100% of quantum tunneling of macro object?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the quantum tunneling probability of macroscopic objects and the role of quantum decoherence. Participants assert that while the probability of quantum tunneling for macroscopic objects is extremely low, it is not zero. A classical analogy involving a table and air molecules illustrates the concept of improbable events occurring due to random interactions. The probability of a chair-sized object tunneling through a wall is described as significantly less than that of the table analogy, reinforcing the idea that while unlikely, quantum tunneling remains a theoretical possibility.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with quantum decoherence concepts
  • Knowledge of probability theory in quantum contexts
  • Basic grasp of classical mechanics and random motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research quantum decoherence effects on macroscopic objects
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of quantum tunneling probabilities
  • Study the implications of quantum mechanics in classical systems
  • Investigate real-world applications of quantum tunneling in technology
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and researchers exploring the intersection of quantum theory and classical physics.

Kinker
Messages
18
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Does quantum decoherence absolutely prevent quantum tunneling of macroscopic objects?
(Decoherence) macro world and quantum world difference
Isn't the quantum tunneling probability of macroscopic objects always zero due to quantum decoherence? It may be possible in the microscopic world, but I always think it is impossible in the macroscopic world due to countless interactions. Isn't this the same in a universe with infinite time? So isn't the probability of a macroscopic object tunneling by chance always zero, regardless of the duration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kinker said:
So isn't the probability of a macroscopic object tunneling by chance always zero, regardless of the duration?
No, it is a very very small non-zero probability.

Consider a similar purely classical setup: There is a table sitting on the floor in front of me, my feet are resting on it. The air molecules above and below it are randomly bouncing around from thermal motion. There is a very very small non-zero probability that all the air molecules above and below the table will just randomly happen to all be moving upwards at the same moment, and if this happens the table will blast its way through the roof like an artillery shell, ripping my feet off and leaving me with bloody stumps at the ends of my legs. The probability of this happening is something like ##2^{(10^{24})}##, we are comfortable saying that it's not going to happen.

The probability of a chair-sized macroscopic object tunneling through a wall is much much less than that.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, Quantum Waver and Demystifier
Nugatory said:
No, it is a very very small non-zero probability.

Consider a similar purely classical setup: There is a table sitting on the floor in front of me, my feet are resting on it. The air molecules above and below it are randomly bouncing around from thermal motion. There is a very very small non-zero probability that all the air molecules above and below the table will just randomly happen to all be moving upwards at the same moment, and if this happens the table will blast its way through the roof like an artillery shell, ripping my feet off and leaving me with bloody stumps at the ends of my legs. The probability of this happening is something like ##2^{(10^{24})}##, we are comfortable saying that it's not going to happen.

The probability of a chair-sized macroscopic object tunneling through a wall is much much less than that.
Does that mean that macroscopic objects can also accidentally experience quantum coherence?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@Kinker You are trying to distinguish between the propositions “It could happen but it won’t” and “It can’t happen”. I’m not sure they are distinguishable.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
54
Views
8K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K