Does Distant Starlight Become Coherent Upon Reaching Earth?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brianhurren
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether light from distant stars, such as Canopus, becomes coherent by the time it reaches Earth. It clarifies that while light can be considered parallel, this does not necessarily imply coherence, as coherence requires light rays to be in phase. The conversation highlights that star light can be mildly polarized due to scattering and magnetic fields, but this does not equate to coherence. Observers close together may perceive distant light as coherent due to negligible angles between rays, but this is a theoretical assumption. Overall, the distinction between coherence and parallelism in light rays is emphasized.
brianhurren
Messages
71
Reaction score
2
by the time light from a distant star reaches us, let's say from Canopus, does the light become coherent?

and if it is coherent, can you make an astrohologram?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
How do you mean "coherent"?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coherence_(physics )
... like a laser you mean?
Short answer: no.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Perhaps you meant polarized instead of coherent. That too is essentially untrue. You can test this yourself by viewing stars through a polarized lens, then rotate the lens 90 degrees and see if the stars changes in brightness. Star light can be mildly polarized due to scattering by dust particles over vast distances and also by strong magnetic fields on the star.
 
Last edited:
... possibly just thinking of the light being parallel?
@brianhurren: any of this useful?
 
If two observers are near, the light rays from such a distance source may be considered as coherent because, the angle between the light rays is too small and negligible. Theoretically, this assumption is valid
 
Varadha said:
If two observers are near, the light rays from such a distance source may be considered as coherent because, the angle between the light rays is too small and negligible. Theoretically, this assumption is valid
Saying that light rays are parallel does not mean they are coherent.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Saying that light rays are parallel does not mean they are coherent.

Oh. Sorry. I thought any parallel rays in phase are coherent
 
Varadha said:
Oh. Sorry. I thought any parallel rays in phase are coherent

yes they are, but that wasnt in your statement earlier, you didnt mention anything about them being in phase

Dave
 
Back
Top