Does eletron spin cause magnetic field?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between electron spin and magnetic fields, particularly in bar magnets and eddy currents. It is clarified that while electron spins in a bar magnet are generally aligned, the concept of eddy currents is distinct from the magnetic field generated by the magnet itself. The magnetic field extends beyond the magnet according to Maxwell's laws, independent of virtual electrons. The Pauli exclusion principle applies to particles, not fields, and does not imply repulsion between fields. Ultimately, the nature of a magnetic field is framed as a description used in physics rather than a physical entity composed of matter.
brianhurren
Messages
71
Reaction score
2
I read somewhere that a magnetic field is caused by the spin of a charge particle, in most cases the electron. So, I take it then that the electrons in the eddy currents in a bar magnet are all spinning in the same direction?
Also, do those eddy currents induce currents in the virtual electrons in the space surrounding the bar magnet, thus extending the field beyond the bar magnet?

if one field encounterd another field with particles of same energy level and spin, would Pauli exclusion principle cause them to repeal?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I read somewhere that a magnetic field is caused by the spin of a charge particle, in most cases the electron. So, I take it then that the electrons in the eddy currents in a bar magnet are all spinning in the same direction?
Which eddy currents do you mean?
The (or most) electron spins in a bar magnet are aligned.
Also, do those eddy currents induce currents in the virtual electrons in the space surrounding the bar magnet
Virtual electrons are not real. That approach will not lead to anything but confusion.
thus extending the field beyond the bar magnet?
The field does not need electrons to be there - the field of the bar magnet just extends beyond the bar magnet according to Maxwell's laws.
if one field encounterd another field with particles of same energy level and spin, would Pauli exclusion principle cause them to repeal?
I don't think this question makes sense.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
The field does not need electrons to be there - the field of the bar magnet just extends beyond the bar magnet according to Maxwell's laws.

I am questioning the use of a theory or law to physically define something. Sure, Maxwell mathematically defined electrical phenomenon, but what is a magnetic field? It is a force, associated with magnets and electric current, but what physical properties/matter is it made of.? Please use permanent magnet soz I can understand...:)
 
The electrons do have a magnetic field which has to do with their "spin". This has nothing to do with eddy currents, which refer to induced currents by a changing magnetic field. Sometimes the magnetic field outside the magnet is said to be composed of virtual photons, not virtual electrons. But this is just one way of modeling it, and you shouldn't think of this picture as gospel.
brianhurren said:
if one field encounterd another field with particles of same energy level and spin, would Pauli exclusion principle cause them to repeal?
You are confusing fields with particles. Pauli exclusion principle will prevent two identical fermions (of which electrons qualify) of the same energy and spin from occupying the same space. Fields are algebraic structures which don't 'encounter' one another. There's just one electromagnetic field, everywhere; and there is a value of the field at any point in space-time. There's also an electron field in quantum field theory. It doesn't make sense to talk about fields repelling each other in the way you would talk about particles. The particles, on the other hand, do repel each other in a way. See electron degeneracy pressure.
 
oflittleuse said:
but what is a magnetic field?
This is a question for philosophy, not for physics. In physics, "magnetic field" is a way to describe experiments related to things called "magnets", "electric current" and so on. And apparently that description (via the Maxwell equations) works very well.

Oh, and please start a new thread for your own questions, this thread is over one year old.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top