Does going from 910 to 790 raise a flag?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ukycme
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the experience of taking the Physics GRE twice, with the first score being 910 and the second 790. The individual was surprised by the lower score on the second attempt, despite feeling more prepared and having time to review answers. Concerns were raised about how admissions committees would view the two scores, particularly whether both need to be reported and how they would be considered—either by taking the highest score or averaging them. It was noted that many schools tend to favor the highest score, and that a score of 790 is still considered strong for many institutions. The variability of GRE tests was mentioned, including the presence of ungraded sections that could affect performance. The consensus suggests that a score above 700 is generally acceptable for top schools, alleviating some anxiety about the lower score, especially for applications to competitive programs like Cornell and Columbia. The inability to cancel the reporting of the second score added to the concern, highlighting the stress of the testing process.
ukycme
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I took the pgre in october and november. I did well in October, 910, and took it again in november, because I didn't know yet that I had done that well. I thought I did better, given that the first time I finished with about 10 minutes to spare, and the second time I finished with 1 hour(maybe this was the problem), and had time to check over most questions. But I did worse, 790, and I was really surprised.

How would you view this, and how much do you think admissions will discount the 910 because of 790 following it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't remember from my applications. Are you required to report both?
 
Sme schools will take the best grade and others may average them together. But I think the trend is to take the best grade. You could check with grad admissions to see how they treat it and whether the physics dept will even see the lower score.

There is some variability in the GRE tests, remember some sections are actually test sections for future tests that aren't graded but they can sometime discourage the test taker and thus adversely affect their score.
 
You're looking at this the wrong way. A 790 is a good score and will get you into many good schools. A 910 is a very high score and the same is true. The order in which you achieved them is pretty irrelevant if you ask me.

My adviser tells me if you score above a 700, how much you get really doesn't matter. One of his students got into Caltech with that score. I've also heard 600-650 is acceptable from a top 25-30 (I think) school's admissions director.
 
Yeah, your probably right, the 790 will be fine for most schools I'm applying to, it was just Cornell and Columbia that I was mostly concerned about.

And I tried to cancel the reporting of the second score for the schools I listed during registration, but I can't. Otherwise, I wouldn't even be worrying about it since you can select with score to send out. But they're going to see both so I got concerned. I'm sure the first day of finals didn't help the anxiety either...
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Back
Top