Other Does Graduate Level Math Enhance Understanding of Undergrad Math?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Orson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graduate
AI Thread Summary
Graduate-level math can enhance understanding of undergraduate math, but it requires a solid grasp of the undergraduate material first. Taking advanced courses like real analysis can deepen comprehension of calculus, but students must master calculus before excelling in these higher-level subjects. Conversely, studying advanced topics without a strong foundation in the prerequisites may lead to gaps in understanding. Additionally, practical applications in courses like physics can reinforce calculus concepts more effectively than theoretical study alone. Ultimately, a comprehensive understanding of foundational topics is crucial for success in advanced mathematics.
Orson
Messages
67
Reaction score
5
Does learning graduate level math make one better understand undergrad math?

For example, after taking real analysis, does one better understand calculus?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Certainly, but conversely, you have to understand calculus to understand real analysis. In other words, graduate courses are not a shortcut to undergraduate learning.
 
  • Like
Likes CalcNerd and symbolipoint
DrSteve said:
Certainly, but conversely, you have to understand calculus to understand real analysis. In other words, graduate courses are not a shortcut to undergraduate learning.
He might have not meant that way, anyway. Studying prerequisite course, and then study a following course which springs from that prerequisite, can often help to understand the prerequisite course better. That may be how he meant his question.
 
  • Like
Likes Orson and DrSteve
A little more specific - although not at all "graduate level", studying Intermediate Algebra, having as prerequisite Introductory Algebra, will help to understand Introductory Algebra much better. As DrSteve described, just studying Intermediate without first studying Introductory, will not be of much help in either of those "Algebra" levels.
 
  • Like
Likes Orson
symbolipoint said:
A little more specific - although not at all "graduate level", studying Intermediate Algebra, having as prerequisite Introductory Algebra, will help to understand Introductory Algebra much better. As DrSteve described, just studying Intermediate without first studying Introductory, will not be of much help in either of those "Algebra" levels.

In terms of algebra, do you mean studying books like Lang and Hungerford will be beneficial than the introductory books like Herstein and Artin?
 
symbolipoint said:
A little more specific - although not at all "graduate level", studying Intermediate Algebra, having as prerequisite Introductory Algebra, will help to understand Introductory Algebra much better. As DrSteve described, just studying Intermediate without first studying Introductory, will not be of much help in either of those "Algebra" levels.
Sounds reasonable. But what I am wondering is.. say you take calculus 1 and 2 and get a B in each, a decent grade, but not fully mastering the material the way you would like. Then you take Advanced Calculus/ real analysis as a junior or senior in undergrad and then again in graduate school. if after getting say an A or B in those subjects, would you have extreme command over calculus 1 and 2?
 
Orson said:
Sounds reasonable. But what I am wondering is.. say you take calculus 1 and 2 and get a B in each, a decent grade, but not fully mastering the material the way you would like. Then you take Advanced Calculus/ real analysis as a junior or senior in undergrad and then again in graduate school. if after getting say an A or B in those subjects, would you have extreme command over calculus 1 and 2?

Not really, if anything, you'll forget a lot about it.
 
Orson said:
Sounds reasonable. But what I am wondering is.. say you take calculus 1 and 2 and get a B in each, a decent grade, but not fully mastering the material the way you would like. Then you take Advanced Calculus/ real analysis as a junior or senior in undergrad and then again in graduate school. if after getting say an A or B in those subjects, would you have extreme command over calculus 1 and 2?
Probably not unless you go back and re-study it. You need an extreme command of those subjects before you can get an A or B in graduate real analysis.
 
bacte2013 said:
In terms of algebra, do you mean studying books like Lang and Hungerford will be beneficial than the introductory books like Herstein and Artin?
Orson said:
Sounds reasonable. But what I am wondering is.. say you take calculus 1 and 2 and get a B in each, a decent grade, but not fully mastering the material the way you would like. Then you take Advanced Calculus/ real analysis as a junior or senior in undergrad and then again in graduate school. if after getting say an A or B in those subjects, would you have extreme command over calculus 1 and 2?
The Calcululs situation, possibly; but I meant for the Algebra situation example, that level which you learn either in high school, or the remedial but same equivalent stuff you learn in a community college.
 
  • #10
The courses which helped me understand Calculus I and II material the most were Physics courses. Mostly because in those courses, I was using the same methods as in Calc I and II, applied in slightly different ways, and taken a bit further mechanically, but not conceptually.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top