Does gravity work in the opposite direction when moving down on a ferris wheel?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jj8890
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
AI Thread Summary
Gravity acts downwards, and when analyzing motion on a ferris wheel, the work done can be calculated using the formula W=2*g*m*r, where g is typically taken as -9.8 m/s² in standard coordinate systems. The direction of gravity can be defined as positive or negative based on the chosen coordinate system, which affects the sign of g in calculations. If down is defined as positive, then gravity would be +9.8 m/s². Ultimately, the choice of direction is a matter of convention and should be consistent throughout the analysis. Understanding these sign conventions is crucial for correctly interpreting the physics involved.
jj8890
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] basic question about gravity

This is just a simple concept question. A person is moving on a ferris wheel around in a circle and the magnitude of the work done on them moving from top to bottom is W=2*g*m*r where m=mass and r-radius of ferris wheel. When plugging in the numbers into the equation, the answer would always be positive correct because gravity is down, positive and mass is positive and the radius is positive. For some reason I am thinking that maybe the gravity would be negative when moving down. I would appreciate any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's all about defining your directions. Once you pick one as positive, the opposite direction must be negative.

Up is usually defined as positive. In this set of coordinates, since gravity is a downwards force, g is -9.8 m/s

There's nothing to stop you from defining down as the positive direction. In this case, since gravity now acts in the same direction as you have defined as positive, it would have to be +9.8 m/s
Sign convention of direction is a matter of choice.You can take the desired axes to be positive and negative.It depends on your accessibility and easiness.There is no hard and fast rule for it.But in most cases the cartesian convention is used.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top