Does Heating Affect Molecular Vibrational Frequencies?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Benzeen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Molecular
AI Thread Summary
Heating a substance increases the speed of molecular vibrations, while cooling slows them down. However, the fundamental vibrational frequencies of molecules remain independent of temperature changes. Instead of heat directly affecting these frequencies, the energy applied to the molecule determines the resonance frequencies observed. The relationship between heat and molecular vibration is complex, as both processes can occur simultaneously but are not directly linked. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing molecular behavior in different thermal states.
Benzeen
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
when a substance cools, its molecules vibrate at a slower speed and when a substance is heated its molecules vibrate quicker, right?. Is the increase in the molecules vibration a result of the heat energy being applied to it, or is it the increase in the vibrational energy of the molecule what causes the substance to heat up? do they both occur simultaneously? thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
When a molecule cools or heated up, the atoms vibrates. Only its displacement changes but not frequency. And these fundamental frequencies are independent of temperature. To find these fundamental frequencies, you scan the molecule with a range of energies [you are not applying heat diretly!], say, from 0 to 4000 cm-1. Now molecule's vibrational fundamental frequency matches with a frequency of the applied energy and so you get a peak...sometimes fundamental frequency are also called resonance frequencies (because molecule's vibrational frequency coincides with applied energy)..Moreover, in the simple frequency formula there is nothing like temperature..it mainly depends on force constant.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top