- #1

- 18

- 0

## Main Question or Discussion Point

Does inertia apply to EVERYTHING in the universe? Even subatomic particles? Or is there a certain mass limit where something no longer has the property of inertia?

- Thread starter Quantumgravity
- Start date

- #1

- 18

- 0

Does inertia apply to EVERYTHING in the universe? Even subatomic particles? Or is there a certain mass limit where something no longer has the property of inertia?

- #2

russ_watters

Mentor

- 19,420

- 5,555

Mass **is** inertia.

- #3

- 905

- 4

No, anything that has mass has inertia, as Russ said above. Of course, there are some particles which physicists believe do not have mass. Neutrinos are an example that comes to mind.Does inertia apply to EVERYTHING in the universe? Even subatomic particles? Or is there a certain mass limit where something no longer has the property of inertia?

- #4

- 18

- 0

Does inertia just mean that it takes energy to move a mass?

- #5

- 905

- 4

"Energy" isn't the right word, but you're moving in the right direction (no pun intended). It's possible for a particle to move without having kinetic energy. Photons, for example, move at a constant vacuum speed c. If an object has inertia, this means thatDoes inertia just mean that it takes energy to move a mass?

- #6

- 18

- 0

Thanks. That clears it up.

But why don't photons have kinetic energy?

But why don't photons have kinetic energy?

- #7

jtbell

Mentor

- 15,518

- 3,353

Nope, for the past several years it's been widely accepted that neutrinos do have a very small mass (a few eV or less). It's studied via neutrino oscillations.Of course, there are some particles which physicists believe do not have mass. Neutrinos are an example that comes to mind.

The only massless particles now, so far as I know, are the photon, the gluons, and the graviton (if it exists).

- #8

- 905

- 4

Oops, looks like I missed the memo! Thanks.Nope, for the past several years it's been widely accepted that neutrinos do have a very small mass (a few eV or less). It's studied via neutrino oscillations.

The only massless particles now, so far as I know, are the photon, the gluons, and the graviton (if it exists).

- #9

- 38

- 1

I wonder to know why too. I thought photons do have kinetic energy equals to their momentum times the speed of light. Is it correct? Thanks.But why don't photons have kinetic energy?

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 655

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 410

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 632

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 3K

- Replies
- 10

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 48

- Views
- 52K

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 3K