Does Larmor precession change the force exerted on a magnetic dipole?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the effects of Larmor precession on the force exerted on a magnetic dipole in a nonuniform magnetic field, specifically described as B=<0,0,k*z>. The force on the dipole is calculated as F=(μ•∇)B=μ_z*k, which remains constant under the assumption that μ•B is constant. Torque is acknowledged but deemed not to affect μ_z, leading to the conclusion that the force exerted on the dipole in the magnetic field remains unchanged despite the presence of torque. The discussion references Gauss's Law for the magnetic field, emphasizing the impossibility of a certain magnetic field configuration in nature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic dipoles and their behavior in magnetic fields
  • Familiarity with Larmor precession and torque in physics
  • Knowledge of Gauss's Law for magnetic fields
  • Basic grasp of angular momentum concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Larmor precession on magnetic dipoles in nonuniform fields
  • Examine the relationship between torque and angular momentum in magnetic systems
  • Review the formalism of magnetic moments in relativistic physics
  • Analyze the provided paper on motion in external plane-wave electromagnetic fields
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in electromagnetism, researchers studying magnetic dipole dynamics, and students exploring advanced concepts in classical mechanics and field theory.

okaythanksbud
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
The torque on a spinning charge seems like it would change the magnetic moment to be more aligned with the B field but is this actually the case?
If we have a spinning spherical charge in a nonuniform magnet field that points in one direction (for simplicity lets say B=<0,0,k*z>). Since the magnetic field is nonuniform, there will be a force exerted on the dipole, F=(mu•∇)B=mu_z*k. So in this case we expect it to be constant. This is dependent on the assumption that mu•B stays constant
However, we are neglecting torque. Upon first glance wed expect the torque to push the charge to align the dipole moment with the magnetic field. However, the torque points perpendicular to the magnetic field and the dipole moment, so it seems like the angular momentum in the direction of the B field (and hence the magnetic moment) would stay constant, while the angular momentum perpendicular to mu and B would change. So just like this image indicates, I'd expect the motion due to torque to not affect mu_z, which would keep F=(mu•∇)B constant.
1693943069511.png


Even though its the unintuitive answer, I'm lead to believe that mu*B, and hence the force of the dipole in the B field would stay constant. Am I correct in this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your ##\vec{B}##-field can't exist in Nature, because according Gauss's Law for the magnetic field you have ##\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{B}=0##.

For complete equations of motion you must have also an equation for the magnetic moment, which is an additional degree of freedom, related to "spin". Here's a paper, dealing with the formalism (in relativistic form) and applying it to the motion in external plane-wave em. fields:

https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.02594
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.052218
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
974
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K