Does Mass Affect Falling Speed with No Air Resistance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AznBoi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concept Confused
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In a vacuum, where air resistance is absent, the mass of an object does not affect its falling speed. Both a grand piano and a pencil dropped from the same height will reach the ground simultaneously due to the principle of free fall, where acceleration is independent of mass. The gravitational force acting on an object is proportional to its mass, but this cancels out when calculating acceleration, leading to uniform acceleration for all objects. A theoretical effect exists where heavier objects may impact the Earth slightly earlier due to the relative acceleration between the object and the Earth, but this is negligible in practical scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the concept of free fall
  • Basic knowledge of gravitational force equations
  • Awareness of the difference between inertial and gravitational mass
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Newton's second law of motion in detail
  • Explore the concept of free fall and its implications in physics
  • Learn about gravitational force equations, specifically F=G(m1*m2)/r^2
  • Investigate the equivalence principle in general relativity
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators explaining gravitational concepts, and anyone interested in the principles of motion and free fall dynamics.

AznBoi
Messages
470
Reaction score
0
Please help, I'm confused with an "easy" concept.

Suppose you drop an object off a cliff. Does increasing the mass of the object you drop decrease the time it takes the object to reach the ground? (Assume that air friction is neglected) Is this true to infinite extent? So if there was no air friction (not possible in the real world), would a grand piano land at the same time as a pencil? I just need to understand this concept as there is no way I can test it to this extent lol. :smile: I want to believe =[
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When fluid mediums such as air (and any other resistance) are theoretically removed the object is said to be in free fall, which means that they fall only under the influence of gravity. In that case if the grand piano and the pencil were dropped from the same height then at a certain time t they would be going the same speed (velocity) and would have fallen the same distance.
 
You know gravitational force is proportional to the mass of the falling body. You also know that acceleration is proportional to force over m. Putting these together tells you that acceleration is independent of mass. You can cancel the mass. As OrbitalPower says, that's 'free fall'.
 
Last edited:
So the gravitational force you are talking about is F=gm1m2/r^2?? m1 being the object and m2 being earth? F=m1a, a=F/m1 Is that why the acceleration of the object is independent of its mass? Are those equations correct?
 
Quite correct.
 
Ok thanks a lot to both of you! =]
 
It should be noted that there is a tiny, theoretical effect present that makes heavier objects impact Earth before lighter.
The Earth itself experiences a greater acceleration with respect to a heavier one, hence the relative acceleration between the object and the Earth is greater, and therefore, the heavier object will impact the Earth first.

Having two objects with masses m, M, m<M, whereas the Earth's mass is M_{e}, the ratio of impact times is:
\frac{t_{m}}{t_{M}}=\sqrt{\frac{M_{e}+{M}}{M_{e}+{m}}}
if we consider either one of them to be released from rest from the same distance from the Earth.
 
Last edited:
A) This is one of the profoundest questions in the history of science- so don't be ashamed in asking it. It involves the equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass, which is certainly not obvious.

B) Yes, you can test these ideas. I'd advise you though to do it safely- don't be dropping objects of tall buildings without thinking things through!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K