Does modular arithmetic have different rules for different cases?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bipolarity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arithmetic Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the equation 2((a+b)mod 2π) = (2a+2b)mod 4π, with a and b being nonnegative and less than 2π. Participants suggest breaking the problem into cases based on the value of (a+b), specifically considering intervals 0 to 2π and 2π to 4π. The original poster seeks assistance with modular arithmetic identities to aid in the proof. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding modular arithmetic rules in different scenarios. Overall, the thread highlights a common challenge in applying modular arithmetic to isomorphism problems.
Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I'm trying to prove the following (as part of an isomorphism problem).
The problem is I don't know much about modular arithmetic, so would appreciate some help.

2((a+b)mod \ 2π) = (2a+2b)mod \ 4π.

given that a,b are both nonnegative and less than 2π.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I believe there are certain identities for modular arithmetic that I could use, but do not know. Can anyone tell me some or give me a link to some modular arithmetic identities? Thanks.

BiP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bipolarity said:

Homework Statement


I'm trying to prove the following (as part of an isomorphism problem).
The problem is I don't know much about modular arithmetic, so would appreciate some help.

2((a+b)mod \ 2π) = (2a+2b)mod \ 4π.

given that a,b are both nonnegative and less than 2π.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I believe there are certain identities for modular arithmetic that I could use, but do not know. Can anyone tell me some or give me a link to some modular arithmetic identities? Thanks.

BiP

Break it into cases i) 0<=(a+b)<2pi and ii) 2pi<=(a+b)<4pi.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top