I Does Moving a Wire Increase its Magnetic Field?

jamesconnolly81
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Folks,

I'm not sure if this is the correct forum topic for my question, but it seems to be close or related.

Question: If you have a wire carrying current then it creates a magnetic field as in the diagram in the link below.
https://nationalmaglab.org/educatio...ay/interactive/magnetic-field-around-a-wire-i
The electrons are moving upwards. What happens if you then move the wire itself upward at a constant speed ?
Does that in any way add to or help the current in any way ? In other words does the magnetic field increase when measured at a fixed point ?

Thanks James
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jamesconnolly81 said:
Does that in any way add to or help the current in any way ? In other words does the magnetic field increase when measured at a fixed point ?
@vanhees71 gave the mathematical answer, so I will add a qualitative answer. Around an uncharged current-carrying wire we have no E field and the B field is in the plane perpendicular to the wire.

You can use the equations in this link to determine the fields in a frame where the wire is moving: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_electromagnetism_and_special_relativity

Briefly, you get an E-field pointing radially outward from the wire and the B field increases by the usual Lorentz factor.
 
But in the rest frame of the wire you have a transverse E-field (in addition to the E-field along the wire keeping the current flowing), and the wire is not uncharged! That's the important point of the above quoted Insights article. Amazingly the relativistic treatment of the current-conducting wire is wrong in many textbook by just assuming that the wire is uncharged in the wire restframe, which however is wrong due to the correct relativistic version of Ohm's Law. As shown in the Insights article (and the nice paper quoted in there), the wire is uncharged in the rest frame of the conduction electrons. All this is easily understood as a consequence of the "self-induced Hall effect" on the current.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top