Does Moving in the Same Direction Affect Work Done by an Electric Field?

AI Thread Summary
The work done by an electric field is defined as N, while the work done by an external force moving against the field is negative N. When moving an object in the same direction as the electric field, the total work is not zero, and the object's kinetic energy will increase. If the external force assists the electric field, it can either slow the particle down or accelerate it beyond the field's influence. The work performed by the external force is equal to the difference between the final kinetic energy and the kinetic energy that would have been achieved without interference. This highlights the interplay between external forces and electric fields in determining work and energy changes.
Calpalned
Messages
297
Reaction score
6
If the work done by an electric field is N, then the work done by me will be negative N? Perhaps this applies if I move a charge against the field lines, but what if I move in the same direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I presume the context here is that you are moving an object with negligible kinetic energy so that the net work done by the field plus your hand is zero. That is when the force bu you is opposite to the force by the electric field, and the work done by you will be the negative of the work done by the electric field. If you move the object in the same direction as the electric field is moving it, then certainly, the total work is not zero, the kinetic energy will keep increasing. Nothing prevents you from helping the electric field.
 
If you move in the same direction then either:

1. You are pulling the particle against the field, hence slowing it down so that its final KE is less than it would have been if it had been freely moving under the force of the field alone.
2. You are pulling the particle with the field, hence accelerating it even more than the field is so that its final KE is more than it would have been if it had been freely moving under the force of the field alone.

In both cases, the work you have done is equal to the final KE of the particle minus what the final KE would have been if you had not interfered with the particle.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top