Does Newly Discovered Supernova Point to Unknown Laws of Physics?

AI Thread Summary
Astronomers have discovered a supernova, SN2005E, that challenges existing theories of stellar explosions, as it lacks the expected carbon and oxygen and is instead rich in helium. This unusual composition suggests that the mechanisms behind supernovae may not be fully understood. Observations from various telescopes, including the Keck Observatory, have provided data that indicate SN2005E does not fit the typical models of supernova formation. While some speculate this discovery could indicate new laws of physics, others argue it merely highlights gaps in current stellar evolution theories. The findings emphasize the complexity of stellar phenomena and the need for further research in astrophysics.
Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2
http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2010/05/do-newly-discovered-exploding-stars-point-to-new-laws-of-physics.html#more


In the past decade, robotic telescopes have turned astronomers' attention to strange exploding stars that may point to new and unusual physics. An international team of astronomers has uncovered a supernova whose origin cannot be explained by any previously known mechanism and which promises exciting new insights into stellar explosions.

SN2005E was first spotted on January 13, 2005 in the nearby galaxy NGC1032. Since then, scientists have carried out various observations of it using different telescopes including the Keck, the world's largest, at Mauna Kea, Hawaii. Analysis of the collected data, theoretical modeling and interpretation led to the conclusion that SN2005E wasn't a typical supernova.

Supernovae result from the collapse of very massive stars or by thermonuclear detonation on the surface of white dwarf stars composed mainly of carbon and oxygen.

"But this one, although it appears to be from a white dwarf system, is devoid of carbon and oxygen. Instead it's rich in helium. It's surprisingly different," said Dae-Sik Moon of the University of Toronto's Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics.

Continued - see link
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I think its a stretch to claim this "points to unknown laws of physics".
 
This just says what we already know: stellar evolution is not fully explained, but new "laws of physics"? I doubt it. This would be like finding a new metabolic pathway for a life-form; that is new, but it is not changing the nature of life.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...

Similar threads

Back
Top