Does relativity restrict velocity relative to an observer?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of relativity on the velocities of objects in relation to each other, specifically addressing the scenario of a spaceship traveling at 186,281 miles per second firing a missile at 1 mile per second. It is established that according to the principles of relativity, the velocity of the missile relative to an external observer cannot exceed the speed of light, even if it appears to be traveling faster when calculated using classical mechanics. The correct formula for combining velocities in relativity is given by the equation \( \frac{u+v}{1+\frac{uv}{c^{2}}} \), ensuring that the resultant speed remains below the speed of light (c).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's Theory of Relativity
  • Familiarity with the concepts of time dilation and length contraction
  • Basic knowledge of velocity addition in special relativity
  • Mathematical proficiency to interpret relativistic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of time dilation in high-speed travel
  • Learn about length contraction and its effects on moving objects
  • Explore the relativistic velocity addition formula in detail
  • Investigate the concept of simultaneity in different reference frames
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the fundamental principles of relativity and their applications in high-velocity scenarios.

jfraze
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I know this is a stupid question but I can't figure out how to get an answer. I'm trying to figure out if the rules of relativity force a limit on the velocities of two objects in relation to each other. Just as a thought experiment, if a spaceship is traveling at 186,281 miles per second over a finite distance from point A to point B, and fires a missile at 1 mile per second relative to itself, that missile should be traveling at 186,282 miles per second relative to points A and B, which is not possible. So would relativity actually prevent the hypothetical missile from traveling at 1 mile per second relative to the hypothetical spaceship? (To take it further, what if the spaceship were traveling 186,281.999999 miles per second... the fastest it could fire a missile, relative to itself, would have to be less than .000001 miles per second. It seems observers on the spaceship would see that missile barely creeping away from them, even relative to their own spacetime.) My best guess on a solution is that since time is compressed for the observers on the spaceship, the missile might be able to travel at 1 mile per second according their experience of what a "second" is, but would still be less than the speed of light relative to points A and B. I may be off on the wrong track with that, though.

OK, you can commence mocking me now.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The missile won't travel faster than the speed of light. Instead of gaining speed, it will gain mass.
 
jfraze said:
My best guess on a solution is that since time is compressed for the observers on the spaceship, the missile might be able to travel at 1 mile per second according their experience of what a "second" is, but would still be less than the speed of light relative to points A and B. I may be off on the wrong track with that, though.

That's pretty much right, although it's not just time dilation that makes the speeds cpme out that way; length contraction and relativity of simultaneity also contribute.

Spaceship fires a missile that travels at speed u relative to the ship. The ship is moving at speed v relative to some observer. The speed of the missile relative to the observer is not u+v as classical mechanics and our experience with objects moving at speeds much less than the speed of light suggests. It will be \frac{u+v}{1+\frac{uv}{c^{2}}}
which is never greater than c, and is indistinguishable from u+v for the speeds that we're familiar with day to day.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K