I How does an observer moving at relativistic speeds perceive a pulsar?

Click For Summary
An observer moving towards a neutron star at relativistic speeds experiences significant time dilation and Doppler effects. The onboard atomic clock remains consistent in its timekeeping, while the frequency of the pulsar's emissions increases due to the relativistic Doppler factor, which can be approximately double the time dilation factor. The perceived rotation speed of the neutron star is not simply its original speed but must be calculated using the relativistic addition of velocities, yielding a tangential speed of about 0.919c. The discrepancy between the expected pulse rate and the observed rate highlights the importance of applying the relativistic Doppler effect correctly. Understanding these concepts requires careful consideration of both time dilation and the geometry of motion relative to the pulsar.
  • #31
PeterDonis said:
I don't see the point of switching scenarios if you haven't even gotten the original one right. The solution of both is the same in any case since we were only concerned with the equatorial plane of the rotating neutron star, which is the same as the rotating disk in your new scenario. So you've already been given the answer to your new scenario anyway.
https://www.astronomy.com/science/weird-object-neutron-star-psr-j1748-2446/

It’s hard to visualize. In everyday life, the fastest-spinning thing we might see is the blade on a kitchen blender or a circular saw. But those never rotate more than a few hundred times a second. This star’s equator moves at one-quarter the speed of light. This rotation of 43,000 miles (70,000km) per second would be like Earth’s equator completing nearly two spins a second instead of one a day.

So now we start moving towards PSR J1748−2446ad at 0.995c, does the 70,000km remain the same or to the speed of light (minus a very small number).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
King Solomon said:
So now we start moving towards PSR J1748−2446ad at 0.995c, does the 70,000km remain the same or to the speed of light (minus a very small number).
Neither. Do the math. I've already pointed you at it.
 
  • #33
King Solomon said:
the 70,000km
Note that this is a speed in the pulsar's rest frame, and you are asking for a speed in the observer's frame. But this speed is not something the observer directly observes. They have to calculate it. Actually, two ways of making that calculation have been given in this thread. One of them just uses the direct velocity addition formula. The other starts with the Doppler factor, which is directly observed (the pulsar's frequency is 20 times faster) and then corrects for the change in light travel time due to the shortening distance between the pulsar and the observer. The two methods will both give the same answer if done correctly.
 
  • #34
Closed for mentor discussion
 
  • #35
After mentor review, this thread will remain closed. The OP scenario has been addressed. Discussion of new scenarios belongs in a new thread. Thanks to all who participated.
 
  • Like
Likes King Solomon

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
5K