Does required time for free falling bodies is independent of mass?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the idea presented by Professor Walter Lewin regarding the potential dependence of free fall time on mass, despite conventional physics asserting it is independent. Some physicists are conducting experiments to explore this possibility, which, if proven, could challenge established theories like General Relativity. Currently, no evidence supports the notion that mass affects free fall time, but the possibility remains open for future discovery. The implications of such a finding would be significant, potentially warranting a Nobel Prize for the discoverer. The conversation highlights the ongoing inquiry into fundamental physics principles.
ddnath
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
In a class at OCW 8.01 Professor Walter Lewin said...

"...there are very prestigious physicists who even nowadays do very fancy
experiments and they try to demonstrate that the time for an apple to fall does depend on its mass even though it probably is only very small, if it's true but they try to prove that. And if any of them succeeds or anyone of you succeeds that's certainly worth a Nobel Prize."

What did he actually mean? Really?! Is it possible to proof that time required for free falling of bodies is not independent of mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it possible to proof that time required for free falling of bodies is not independent of mass?
We don't know. It has not been observed yet, but it could be observed in the future.
IF there is any deviation (that is a big if), it would mean that General Relativity is wrong.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top