Does speed increase ionizing power

AI Thread Summary
Alpha particles, despite traveling at about 5-7% of the speed of light, have a high ionizing power due to their double positive charge and larger mass compared to beta particles, allowing them to cause significant biological damage over short distances. They are relatively slow, which enables them to ionize surrounding air particles effectively, but they cannot travel far as they quickly become stable helium atoms by picking up electrons. In contrast, beta particles, which travel at speeds up to 75% of the speed of light, are smaller and less ionizing because of their lower charge and mass. Ionizing radiation typically has high speeds due to the fundamental properties of the particles involved. Overall, the relationship between speed and ionizing power is complex, with factors like mass and charge playing crucial roles.
Clara Chung
Messages
300
Reaction score
13
Some said alpha particles are released in high speed so that it has a high ionizing power. But some said alpha particles (~10% light speed) have higher ionizing power than beta particles (~30% light speed) because it is slower, so it gives more time for it to ionizing surrounded air particles.
So ionizing power increases with increasing speed ,or decreases with increasing speed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi there

you are coming from a slightly incorrect premise

Their velocity is reasonably constant within a range of around 5 - 7 % the speed of light, but what makes them highly ionising is because of their double positive charge, large mass (compared to a beta particle) and because they are relatively slow. They can cause many ionisations within a very small distance. This gives them the potential to do much more biological damage ( damage to living tissue) for the same amount of deposited energy. Alpha particles don't travel very far because they quickly pick up free electrons and become stable Helium atoms.
They are easily stopped by a sheet of paper. Alpha particles will do the most damage to tissue when they are swallowed (ingested) when their emission is directly into tissue.

Beta particles on the other hand are much faster but are much smaller ... they are emitted as forms of electrons. And even tho they are very high speed, because of their smaller charge and size, they are only moderately ionisingDave
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
davenn said:
hi there

you are coming from a slightly incorrect premise

Teir velocity is reasonably constant within a range of around 5 - 7 % the speed of light, but what makes them highly ionising is because of their double positive charge, large mass (compared to a beta particle) and because they are relatively slow. They can cause many ionisations within a very small distance. This gives them the potential to do much more biological damage ( damage to living tissue) for the same amount of deposited energy. Alpha particles don't travel very far because they quickly pick up free electrons and become stable Helium atoms.
They are easily stopped by a sheet of paper. Alpha particles will do the most damage to tissue when they are swallowed (ingested) when their emission is directly into tissue.

Beta particles on the other hand are much faster but are much smaller ... they are emitted as forms of electrons. And even tho they are very high speed, because of their smaller charge and size, they are only moderately ionisingDave
Thanks for your reply, apart from other factors,
Why do ionising radiation usually have high speed?
 
Clara Chung said:
Thanks for your reply, apart from other factors,
Why do ionising radiation usually have high speed?

the velocities of the particles are what they are
it's like asking why is the speed of light what it is ? ... that's just the way it is :wink:

so you have 3 forms of ionising radiation

1) Alpha ... ~ 5 - 7 % of speed of light
2) Beta ... can be up to 75% of speed of light (in a vacuum) ( google Cherenkov radiation)
3) Gamma rays ( are photons) so they are the speed of light in a vacuum
Dave
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top