Does the entropy of a closed system always increase

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of entropy in closed systems and whether it can decrease. The standard view, based on the laws of thermodynamics, is that entropy tends to increase, but there are scenarios where it could decrease, albeit with low probability. One example involves a small closed system where the number of possible states is reduced, making ordered arrangements more likely, such as in a simplified billiards game scenario. Another example highlights the role of gravity, which can organize a disordered system into a structured arrangement, although this may imply a non-equilibrium state that challenges the second law of thermodynamics. The conversation also touches on the statistical nature of entropy, suggesting that while entropy generally increases, small-scale fluctuations can lead to temporary decreases. The importance of large sample sizes in thermodynamics is emphasized, as smaller systems may not adhere strictly to the second law.
Jeebus
Messages
255
Reaction score
0
Question: Does the entropy of a closed system always increase, or could it possibly decrease?

Answer: The standard answer to your question from the laws of thermodynamics is that entropy (disorder) will increase, but there are at least two ways I believe entropy can decrease in a closed system.


First, you used the word 'possibly'. The laws of probability allow a closed system's entropy to decrease, but with such a low likelihood that the odds would make it very unlikely. Making the system small enough, however, by decreasing the number of its possible states can help improve the odds.


Take, for example, a movie of a billiards game 'break' shot. The ordered arrangement of balls becomes disordered, but running the film in reverse would show each individual collision obeying the usual physical laws. The time reversal would be apparent, however, when all the balls ended up in an ordered collection. Although that result could conceivably occur by chance, it is very unlikely. Reducing the example to just two balls would make the odds of an orderly arrangement occurring more likely.


For a second example of decreasing entropy, start with a closed system large enough to allow significant gravitational forces among its components. Gravity provides a 'negative energy' that can take a completely disordered system and organize it into a radically symmetric arrangement around a common center of gravity.



Follow-up Question to above Answer: Regarding the above example of the 2nd law and gravity "organizing" the balls...In that case, wouldn't the balls be in a non-equilibrium state to begin with, since it allows for seemingly automatic movement of the balls? That would mean that not all the conditions for 2LOT have been fulfilled and it would not be a great surprise to see some end-state of organization, right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
You are right staiscally it is possible in any closed system for entropy to increase, indeed on very small scales, over short time periods this has been observed. Note the second law really should say 'tend' to increase rather than 'will' increase' at is a staistcal process.

Gravity is no way to combat entropy, your forgetting the GPE lost by objects as the fall towards mass.
 
So first one is right, second is wrong. But hey, that first one was pretty darn good - its essentially a logical proof of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
 
Thermodynamics is a subset of the field Statistical Mechanics. It is implicit in the field that sample sizes will be sufficiently large to essentially disregard that which is statistically insignificant. By applying the 2nd law of thermodynamics, a large enough sample size is assumed to make it true. Otherwise, you really have a "many-body" problem, in which you must solve for each individual body's state.

Njorl
 
Originally posted by Njorl
Thermodynamics is a subset of the field Statistical Mechanics. It is implicit in the field that sample sizes will be sufficiently large to essentially disregard that which is statistically insignificant. By applying the 2nd law of thermodynamics, a large enough sample size is assumed to make it true. Otherwise, you really have a "many-body" problem, in which you must solve for each individual body's state.

Njorl


Ok. Thanks for the insight.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
921
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K